Cited by 44Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsRobot Manipulation and Learning3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

ViewRefer: Grasp the Multi-view Knowledge for 3D Visual Grounding

Guo, Zoey, Tang, Yiwen, Zhang, Ray, Wang, Dong, Wang, Zhigang, Zhao, Bin, Li, Xuelong·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

Understanding 3D scenes from multi-view inputs has been proven to alleviate the view discrepancy issue in 3D visual grounding. However, existing methods normally neglect the view cues embedded in the text modality and fail to weigh the relative importance of different views. In this paper, we propose ViewRefer, a multi-view framework for 3D visual grounding exploring how to grasp the view knowledge from both text and 3D modalities. For the text branch, ViewRefer leverages the diverse linguistic knowledge of large-scale language models, e.g., GPT, to expand a single grounding text to multiple geometry-consistent descriptions. Meanwhile, in the 3D modality, a transformer fusion module with inter-view attention is introduced to boost the interaction of objects across views. On top of that, we further present a set of learnable multi-view prototypes, which memorize scene-agnostic knowledge for different views, and enhance the framework from two perspectives: a view-guided attention module for more robust text features, and a view-guided scoring strategy during the final prediction. With our designed paradigm, ViewRefer achieves superior performance on three benchmarks and surpasses the second-best by +2.8%, +1.5%, and +1.35% on Sr3D, Nr3D, and ScanRefer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01410

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transfer learning through pre-trained networks streamlines training by allowing efficient fine-tuning for specific applications, enhancing adaptability and performance across diverse tasks, particularly when acquiring extensive labeled data is impractical.

    “Transfer learning, through the use of pre-trained networks, streamlines the training process by allowing models to be efficiently fine-tuned for specific applications, thereby enhancing adaptability and performance across diverse tasks, and proving particularly beneficial in scenarios where acquiring extensive labeled data is impractical or unfeasible [188], [189].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, Z., Tang, Y., Zhang, R., Wang, D., Wang, Z., Zhao, B., & Li, X.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CN)
  • Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-10-01
Pages
15326-15337
OpenAlex
W4390871962
Cited by
44
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19
FWCI
4.70
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Keywords
3D visual grounding, large language models, 3D scene understanding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review