Cited by 172Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SPViT: Enabling Faster Vision Transformers via Latency-Aware Soft Token Pruning

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-20083-0_37

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 84 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Bao, H., Dong, L., Piao, S., Wei, F.: BEit: BERT pre-training of image transformers. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2022). https://openreview.net/forum?id=p-BhZSz59o4
  2. Chen, B., et al.: Psvit: better vision transformer via token pooling and attention sharing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.03428 (2021) · arXiv
  3. Chen, P., Chen, Y., Liu, S., Yang, M., Jia, J.: Exploring and improving mobile level vision transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.13015 (2021) · arXiv
  4. Chen, T., Chen, X., Ma, X., Wang, Y., Wang, Z.: Coarsening the granularity: towards structurally sparse lottery tickets. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2022)
  5. Chen, T., Saxena, S., Li, L., Fleet, D.J., Hinton, G.: Pix2seq: a language modeling framework for object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.10852 (2021) · arXiv
  6. Chen, X., Hsieh, C.J., Gong, B.: When vision transformers outperform resnets without pre-training or strong data augmentations. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2022). https://openreview.net/forum?id=LtKcMgGOeLt
  7. Cheng, B., Schwing, A., Kirillov, A.: Per-pixel classification is not all you need for semantic segmentation. In: Beygelzimer, A., Dauphin, Y., Liang, P., Vaughan, J.W. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2021). https://openreview.net/forum?id=0lz69oI5iZP
  8. Chu, X., et al.: Conditional positional encodings for vision transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.10882 (2021) · arXiv
  9. Dosovitskiy, A., et al.: An image is worth 16 $$\times $$ 16 words: transformers for image recognition at scale. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2021). https://openreview.net/forum?id=YicbFdNTTy
  10. El-Nouby, A., Neverova, N., Laptev, I., Jégou, H.: Training vision transformers for image retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.05644 (2021) · arXiv
  11. Fayyaz, M., et al.: Ats: adaptive token sampling for efficient vision transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.15667 (2021) · arXiv
  12. Gao, P., Lu, J., Li, H., Mottaghi, R., Kembhavi, A.: Container: context aggregation network. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.01401 (2021) · arXiv
  13. Jia, D., et al.: Efficient vision transformers via fine-grained manifold distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.01378 (2021) · arXiv
  14. Jiang, Z., et al.: All tokens matter: token labeling for training better vision transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.10858 (2021) · arXiv
  15. Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., Lee, H., Hinton, G.: Similarity of neural network representations revisited. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 3519–3529. PMLR (2019)
  16. Liang, Y., GE, C., Tong, Z., Song, Y., Wang, J., Xie, P.: EVit: expediting vision transformers via token reorganizations. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2022). https://openreview.net/forum?id=BjyvwnXXVn_
  17. Liu, N., et al.: Lottery ticket preserves weight correlation: is it desirable or not? In: International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 7011–7020. PMLR (2021)
  18. Liu, Y., Sangineto, E., Bi, W., Sebe, N., Lepri, B., De Nadai, M.: Efficient training of visual transformers with small-size datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.03746 (2021) · arXiv
  19. Ma, X., et al.: Sanity checks for lottery tickets: Does your winning ticket really win the jackpot? In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) 34 (2021)
  20. Pan, B., Jiang, Y., Panda, R., Wang, Z., Feris, R., Oliva, A.: Ia-red$$^2$$: Interpretability-aware redundancy reduction for vision transformers. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2021)
  21. Prillo, S., Eisenschlos, J.: Softsort: a continuous relaxation for the argsort operator. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 7793–7802. PMLR (2020)
  22. Raghu, M., Unterthiner, T., Kornblith, S., Zhang, C., Dosovitskiy, A.: Do vision transformers see like convolutional neural networks? arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.08810 (2021) · arXiv
  23. Rao, Y., Zhao, W., Liu, B., Lu, J., Zhou, J., Hsieh, C.J.: Dynamicvit: efficient vision transformers with dynamic token sparsification. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2021)
  24. Renggli, C., Pinto, A.S., Houlsby, N., Mustafa, B., Puigcerver, J., Riquelme, C.: Learning to merge tokens in vision transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.12015 (2022) · arXiv
  25. Ryoo, M.S., Piergiovanni, A., Arnab, A., Dehghani, M., Angelova, A.: Tokenlearner: what can 8 learned tokens do for images and videos? In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2021)
  26. Sanh, V., Wolf, T., Rush, A.M.: Movement pruning: adaptive sparsity by fine-tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.07683 (2020) · arXiv
  27. Steiner, A., Kolesnikov, A., Zhai, X., Wightman, R., Uszkoreit, J., Beyer, L.: How to train your vit? data, augmentation, and regularization in vision transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10270 (2021) · arXiv
  28. Touvron, H., Cord, M., Douze, M., Massa, F., Sablayrolles, A., J’egou, H.: Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attention. In: ICML (2021)
  29. Wu, B., et al.: Visual transformers: token-based image representation and processing for computer vision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.03677 (2020) · arXiv
  30. Yu, H., Wu, J.: A unified pruning framework for vision transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.15127 (2021) · arXiv
  31. Yu, Q., Xia, Y., Bai, Y., Lu, Y., Yuille, A., Shen, W.: Glance-and-gaze vision transformer. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2021)
  32. Yuan, L., et al.: Tokens-to-token vit: training vision transformers from scratch on imagenet. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.11986 (2021) · DOI · Paper page
  33. Zhu, M., Han, K., Tang, Y., Wang, Y.: Visual transformer pruning. In: KDD 2021 Workshop on Model Mining (2021)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–172 of 172

Metadata

Authors
Kong, Z., Dong, P., Ma, X., Meng, X., Niu, W., Sun, M., Shen, X., Yuan, G., Ren, B., Tang, H., Qin, M., & Wang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Clemson University (US)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • William & Mary (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Wang, Yanzhi
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2022
Pages
620-640
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4312910119
Cited by
169
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 3
FWCI
13.06
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
vision transformer, token selection, multi-head attention, edge deployment, mobile devices, FPGA, real-time inference, DeiT, Swin Transformer, computation cost reduction, accuracy-latency trade-off

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review