Cited by 1Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Multimodal Promptable Token Merging for Diffusion Models

Open access
Hong, Cheng-Yao, Liu, Tyng-Luh·2025·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Token compression techniques, such as token merging and pruning, are essential for alleviating the substantial computational burden caused by the proliferation of tokens within attention mechanisms. However, current methods often rely on token-to-token distances or similarity metrics to evaluate token importance, which is inadequate in the context of modern promptable designs and frameworks that are gaining prominence. To address this limitation, we introduce a novel and effective merging strategy called “Multimodal Promptable Token Merging” (MPTM). The proposed method leverages a multimodal, prompt-centric methodology, assessing the proximity between tokens of each input modality and the multimodal prompt to efficiently eliminate redundant tokens while preserving those rich in information. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MPTM significantly reduces computational costs without compromising essential information in generative image tasks. When integrated into diffusion-based detection architectures, MPTM outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods by 2.3% in object detection tasks. Additionally, when applied to multimodal diffusion models, MPTM maintains high-quality output while achieving a 2.9-fold increase in throughput, highlighting its versatility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v39i16.33894

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Chen, S.; Sun, P.; Song, Y.; and Luo, P. 2023c. Diffusiondet: Diffu- sion model for object detection. In IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog. (CVPR), 19830-19843.
  2. Ge, S.; Park, T.; Zhu, J.; and Huang, J. 2023. Expressive Text- to-Image Generation with Rich Text. In Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV).
  3. Gong, C.; Wang, D.; Li, M.; Chen, X.; Yan, Z.; Tian, Y.; Liu, Q.; and Chandra, V. 2022. NASViT: Neural Architecture Search for Ef- ficient Vision Transformers with Gradient Conflict aware Supernet Training. In Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR).
  4. Han, S.; Mao, H.; and Dally, W. J. 2016. Deep Compression: Com- pressing Deep Neural Network with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Coding. In Bengio, Y.; and LeCun, Y., eds., Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR).
  5. Kirillov, A.; Mintun, E.; Ravi, N.; Mao, H.; Rolland, C.; Gustafson, L.; Xiao, T.; Whitehead, S.; Berg, A. C.; Lo, W.-Y.; et al. 2023. Segment anything. In Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV).
  6. Poole, B.; Jain, A.; Barron, J. T.; and Mildenhall, B. 2022. DreamFu- sion: Text-to-3D using 2D Diffusion. In Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR).
  7. Qi, C.; Cun, X.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, C.; Wang, X.; Shan, Y.; and Chen, Q. 2023. FateZero: Fusing Attentions for Zero-shot Text-based Video Editing Supplemental Material. In Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV).
  8. Razavi, A.; van den Oord, A.; and Vinyals, O. 2019. Generating Diverse High-Fidelity Images with VQ-VAE-2. In Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), 14837-14847.
  9. Tang, Z.; Yang, Z.; Zhu, C.; Zeng, M.; and Bansal, M. 2023b. Any- to-Any Generation via Composable Diffusion. In Adv. Neural In- form. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS).
  10. Wang, Z.; Luo, H.; Wang, P.; Ding, F.; Wang, F.; and Li, H. 2022. VTC-LFC: Vision Transformer Compression with Low-Frequency Components. In Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hong, C.-Y., & Liu, T.-L.
Affiliations
Academia Sinica (TW)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-04-11
Volume
39
Issue
16
Pages
17231-17239
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W4409364419
Cited by
0
References
42
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science and Technology Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
token merging, token compression, multimodal prompts, computational efficiency, object detection, multimodal diffusion models, image generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review