CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16Student Assessment and FeedbackArtificial Intelligence in EducationEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Chatbot Feedback on Students’ Writing: Typology of Comments and Effectiveness

Open access
Allagui, Besma·2023·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-37129-5_31
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-37129-5_31

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ChatGPT can support student writing by providing appropriate directions related to content and organization as they write.

    “It can support student writing by providing appropriate directions related to content and organization as they write (Allagui, 2023).”

    From Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study (2024) · cites this paper as Allagui, 2023

  • The positive impact of ChatGPT was evident in students' achievements in generation of focused ideas.

    “The positive impact was evident in students' achievements in terms of generation of focused ideas, better connection among ideas and sentences, and improved grammatical accuracy, which were also claimed by previous researchers (Allagui, 2023;Kohnke et al., 2023;Su et al., 2023;Wang & Guo, 2023).”

    From Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study (2024) · cites this paper as Allagui, 2023

  • The positive impact of ChatGPT was evident in students' achievements in improved grammatical accuracy.

    “The positive impact was evident in students' achievements in terms of generation of focused ideas, better connection among ideas and sentences, and improved grammatical accuracy, which were also claimed by previous researchers (Allagui, 2023;Kohnke et al., 2023;Su et al., 2023;Wang & Guo, 2023).”

    From Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study (2024) · cites this paper as Allagui, 2023

  • The perceived impact on organization confirms the findings of Allagui (2023) and Marzuki et al. (2023), who highlight the help with the organization of content in their study.

    “In terms of organization, the perceived impact confirms the findings of Allagui (2023) and Marzuki et al. (2023), who highlight the help with the organization of content in their study.”

    From Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study (2024) · cites this paper as Allagui (2023)

  • The positive impact of ChatGPT was evident in students' achievements in better connection among ideas and sentences.

    “The positive impact was evident in students' achievements in terms of generation of focused ideas, better connection among ideas and sentences, and improved grammatical accuracy, which were also claimed by previous researchers (Allagui, 2023;Kohnke et al., 2023;Su et al., 2023;Wang & Guo, 2023).”

    From Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study (2024) · cites this paper as Allagui, 2023

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Allagui, B.
Affiliations
Rabdan Academy (AE)
Corresponding author
Allagui, Besma
ORCID
Allagui, Besma
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Published
2023
Pages
377-384
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-37129-5_31
OpenAlex
W4382371682
Cited by
16
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5
FWCI
37.84
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Rabdan Academy Digital Repository (Rabdan Academy) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
automated writing feedback, student writing, artificial intelligence in education, instructor workload

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review