Cited by 7Teaching and Learning ProgrammingEngineering Education and Curriculum DevelopmentHigher Education Teaching and Evaluation

Modeling Programming Competency: A Qualitative Analysis

Kiesler, Natalie·2024·Springer eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-47148-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An examination of course syllabi showed that reading and tracing code is often an afterthought in computing courses.

    “Although the ability to both read and trace code has always been important [19,128], an examination of course syllabi showed that this is often an afterthought [37,112,114].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kiesler, N.
Affiliations
DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education (DE)
Corresponding author
Kiesler, Natalie
Venue
Springer eBooks
Published
2024
OpenAlex
W4390292222
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
6.12
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • OHMdok (Technische Hochschule Nürnberg) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation
Keywords
programming skills, programming education, competency modeling, software engineering education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review