Cited by 1Machine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

MuST: Multimodal Spatiotemporal Graph-Transformer for Hospital Readmission Prediction

Open access
Miao, Yan, Yu, Lequan·2023·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-47425-5_25

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miao, Y., & Yu, L.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Yu, Lequan
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2023
Pages
276-285
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4391465165
Cited by
1
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.18
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (62201483)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
hospital readmission prediction, multimodal fusion, graph convolutional networks, temporal transformer, electronic health records, chest radiograph, clinical notes, MIMIC-IV, medical prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review