Cited by 10Sustainable Building Design and AssessmentBIM and Construction IntegrationSustainable Supply Chain Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Unlocking the Potential of Material and Building Passports in the Transition to a Circular Economy in Buildings: A Critical Review

Open access

Abstract

The transition towards a Circular Economy (CE) stands as a pivotal strategy in reshaping our prevailing consumption patterns towards more sustainable resource management. Within this context, the European Union places a strong emphasis on elevating recycling and renovation rates while reducing dependence on primary resources, with a particular focus on the construction industry. Material and Building Passports have emerged as potential tools to facilitate this transition. They play a multifaceted role in CE, serving to raise awareness of the building’s performance, functioning as digital repositories of extensive data, and acting as consulting instruments for stakeholders involved in renovation actions, energy management, and building operation. However, a universally accepted definition of these tools remains elusive, and diverse interpretations persist. To contribute to a deeper understanding of these tools, this study embarks on a comprehensive review, tracing their evolutionary journey and delving into the potentialities and synergies they offer in fostering circularity throughout the life cycle of buildings. It also examines the barriers hindering their full-scale development and adoption, including the lack of standardization and legislative measures, financial constraints, issues of stakeholder involvement and responsibility, as well as challenges associated with data accessibility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-57800-7_37

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Sesana MM, Salvalai G (2018) A review on building renovation passport: potentialities and barriers on current initiatives. Energy Build 173:195–205 · DOI
  2. Honic M, Kovacic I, Rechberger H (2019) Concept for a BIM-based material passport for buildings. In: Proceedings of IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, 225(1), SBE19 Brussels - BAMB-CIRCPATH “Buildings as material banks - a pathway for a circular future”, Brussels, Belgium · DOI
  3. van Capelleveen G, Vegter D, Olthaar M, van Hillegersberg J (2023) The anatomy of a passport for the circular economy: a conceptual definition, vision, and structured literature review. Resour Conserv Recycl Adv 17:200131
  4. O’Shea P (1995) Dealing with EMI/RFI: EMI/RFI test labs provide your product’s passport to Europe. Eval Eng 34(11):124–133
  5. Buchholz M, Lützkendorf T (2022) Building passports and material inventories - concepts, trends, job sharing. In: IOP conference series: earth environmental science, vol 1122, p 012038 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Gómez-Gil M, Sesana MM, Salvalai G, Espinosa-Fernández A, López-Mesa B (2023) The digital building logbook as a gateway linked to existing national data sources: the cases of Spain and Italy. J Build Eng 63:105461 · DOI
  7. Gómez-Gil M, Espinosa-Fernández A, López-Mesa B (2022) Review and analysis of models for a European digital building logbook. Energies 15(6):1994 · DOI
  8. Gómez-Gil M, Espinosa-Fernández A, López-Mesa B A new functionality for the digital building logbook: assessing the progress of decarbonisation of national building sectors. Environ Impact Assess Rev 105:107393 · DOI
  9. López-Mesa B, Beltrán-Velamazán C, Gómez-Gil M, Monzón-Chavarrías M, Espinosa-Fernández A (2023) New approaches to generate data to measure the progress of decarbonization of the building stock in Europe and Spain. In: López-Mesa, B, Oregi X (eds) Assessing progress in decarbonizing Spain’s building stock. Indicators and data availability. Springer · DOI
  10. Schützenhofer S, Honic M, Kovacic I (2020) Design optimisation via BIM supported material passports. In: Werner L, Koering D (eds) Anthropologic: architecture and fabrication in the cognitive age. Proceedings of the 38th eCAADe conference, Berlin, Germany, pp 289–296 · DOI
  11. Çetin S, Raghu D, Honic M, Straub A, Gruis V (2023) Data requirements and availabilities for material passports: a digitally enabled framework for improving the circularity of existing buildings. Sustain Prod Consumption 40:422–437 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gómez-Gil M, Espinosa-Fernández A, López-Mesa B (2022) Contribution of new digital technologies to the digital building logbook. Buildings 12(12):2129 · DOI
  13. Kedir F, Hall DM, Brantvall S, Lessing J, Hollberg A, Soman RK (2023) Circular information flows in industrialized housing construction: the case of a multi-family housing product platform in Sweden. Construction Innovation · DOI · Paper page
  14. Malmgren L, Jensen P, Olofsson T (2011) Product modeling of configurable building systems - a case study. Electron J Inf Technol Constr 15:354–368
  15. Elmualim A, Mostafa S, Chileshe N, Rameezdeen R (2018) Chapter 19 construction and the circular economy: smart and industrialised prefabrication. In: Unmaking waste in production and consumption: towards the circular economy. Emerald Publishing, pp 323–336 · DOI
  16. Kedir F, Hall DM (2021) Resource efficiency in industrialized housing construction – a systematic review of current performance and future opportunities. J Clean Prod 286:125443 · DOI
  17. Akbarieh A, Carbone W, Schäfer M, Waldmann D, Teferle FN (2020) Extended producer responsibility in the construction sector through blockchain, BIM and smart contract technologies. In: WCST 2020 conference papers index, London, UK · DOI
  18. Ansah MK, Chen X, Yang H, Lu L, Lam PT (2021) Developing an automated BIM-based life cycle assessment approach for modularly designed high-rise buildings. Environ Impact Assess Rev 90:106618 · DOI
  19. Hamidi B, Bulbul T (2013) A comparative analysis of sustainable approaches to building end-of-lifecycle: underlying deconstruction principles in theory and practice. In: ICSDEC 2012: Developing the frontier of sustainable design, engineering, and construction, Fort Worth, Texas, USA, pp 155–162 · DOI
  20. Espinoza-Zambrano P, Marmolejo-Duarte C, García-Hooghuis A (2023) Libro del Edificio Electrónico (LdE-e): advancing towards a comprehensive tool for the management and renovation of multifamily buildings in Spain. Sustainability 15(4):2957 · DOI
  21. Hu X, Zhou Y, Vanhullebusch MR, Cui Z, Li J (2022) Smart building demolition and waste management frame with image-to-BIM. J Build Eng 49:104058 · DOI
  22. Kang K, Besklubova S, Dai Y, Zhong RY (2022) Building demolition waste management through smart BIM: a case study in Hong Kong. Waste Manag 143:69–83 · DOI
  23. Atta I, Bakhoum ES, Marzouk MM (2021) Digitizing material passport for sustainable construction projects using BIM. J Build Eng 43:103233 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Honic M, Kovacic I, Aschenbrenner P, Ragossnig A (2021) Material passports for the end-of-life stage of buildings: challenges and potentials. J Clean Prod 319:128702 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Panza L, Faveto A, Bruno G, Lombardi F (2022) Open product development to support circular economy through a material lifecycle management framework. Int J Prod Lifecycle Manag 14(2–3):255–281 · DOI
  26. Munaro MR, Fischer AC, Azevedo NC, Tavares SF (2019) Proposal of a building material passport and its application feasibility to the wood frame constructive system in Brazil. In: Proceedings of IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, 225(1), SBE19 Brussels - BAMB-CIRCPATH “buildings as material banks - a pathway for a circular future”, Brussels, Belgium · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gómez-Gil, M., Askar, R., Karanafti, A., Trubina, N., Blázquez, T., Güngör, B., Bragança, L., & Leindecker, G.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
  • University of Minho (PT)
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
  • University of Córdoba (ES)
  • İzmir Demokrasi Üniversitesi (TR)
  • University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria (AT)
Corresponding author
Leindecker, Gerald
Venue
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering
Published
2024
Pages
404-413
ISSN
  • 2366-2557 (ISSN-L)
  • 2366-2565
OpenAlex
W4396773117
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
FWCI
10.46
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in civil engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Deposito de Investigacion Universidad de Sevilla (University of Seville) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
material passports, circular economy, building renovation, construction and demolition waste, building life cycle, standardization, stakeholder engagement, data accessibility, energy management, building operation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review