Computers Helping People with Special Needs: 19th International Conference, ICCHP 2024, Linz, Austria, July 8–12, 2024, Proceedings, Part I
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There has not been an examination of mixed ability teams that considers specifically how representational barriers impede work, and how different teams engage in representational transformation to address these barriers.
“Although this type of invisible labour has been touched upon in previous analyses of mixed-ability teams (in work activities [9, 19, 41, 48, 61] and other contexts [75]), there has not been an examination of mixed ability teams that considers specifically how representational barriers impede work, and how different teams engage in representational transformation to address these barriers.”
From Accessibility-Driven Information Transformations in Mixed-Visual Ability Work Teams (2026) · cites this paper as [41]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schmitt-Koopmann, F. M., Huang, E. M., Hutter, H.-P., & Darvishy, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713084 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Accessibility-Driven Information Transformations in Mixed-Visual Ability Work Teams
Zhao, Y., A. Nacenta, M., A. Sukhai, M., & Somanath, S. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790872 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Miesenberger, K., Peňáz, P., & Kobayashi, M.
- ORCID
- Klaus Miesenberger
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Nature Switzerland
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W4400315695
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2024-10-13)
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Keywords
- assistive technology, accessibility, people with disabilities, deaf users, blind users, motor impairment, web accessibility, document accessibility, software accessibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
