Cited by 4,823Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Information

Open access
Wang, Chien-Yao, Yeh, I-Hau, Mark Liao, Hong-Yuan·2025·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-72751-1_1

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, C.-Y., Yeh, I.-H., & Mark Liao, H.-Y.
Affiliations
National Taipei University of Technology (TW)
Corresponding author
Wang, Chien-Yao
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2024-10-26
Pages
1-21
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4403770406
Cited by
4,823
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1515 · 2025: 2460 · 2024: 848
FWCI
995.57
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
YOLOv9, information bottleneck, lightweight neural networks, object detection, convolutional neural networks, parameter efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review