Cited by 42Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAI-based Problem Solving and Planning

Think2Drive: Efficient Reinforcement Learning by Thinking with Latent World Model for Autonomous Driving (in CARLA-V2)

Li, Qifeng, Jia, Xiaosong, Wang, Shaobo, Yan, Junchi·2025·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-72995-9_9

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Brooks, F.P.: The Mythical Man-Month: essays on Software, 1st edn. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., USA (1978)
  2. , Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., Lopez, A., Koltun, V.: CARLA: an open urban driving simulator. In: Conference on Robot Learning, pp. 1–16. PMLR (2017)
  3. Haarnoja, T., Zhou, A., Abbeel, P., Levine, S.: Soft actor-critic: off-policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor. arXiv : Learning (January 2018)
  4. Hafner, D., et al.: Learning latent dynamics for planning from pixels. In: International Conference On Machine Learning, pp. 2555–2565. PMLR (2019)
  5. Jia, X., et al.: Towards capturing the temporal dynamics for trajectory prediction: a coarse-to-fine approach. In: Liu, K., Kulic, D., Ichnowski, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Robot Learning. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 205, pp. 910–920. PMLR (2023). https://proceedings.mlr.press/v205/jia23a.html
  6. Li, Q., Jia, X., Wang, S., Yan, J.: Think2Drive: efficient reinforcement learning by thinking in latent world model for quasi-realistic autonomous driving (in CARLA-V2) (2024).https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.16720
  7. Nikishin, E., Schwarzer, M., D’Oro, P., Bacon, P.L., Courville, A.: The primacy bias in deep reinforcement learning. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 16828–16847. PMLR (2022)
  8. Sutton, R.S., McAllester, D., Singh, S., Mansour, Y.: Policy gradient methods for reinforcement learning with function approximation. Adv. Neural Info. Process. Syst. 12 (1999)
  9. Wu, P., Chen, L., Li, H., Jia, X., Yan, J., Qiao, Y.: Policy pre-training for autonomous driving via self-supervised geometric modeling. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2023)
  10. Wu, P., Escontrela, A., Hafner, D., Abbeel, P., Goldberg, K.: DayDreamer: world models for physical robot learning. In: Conference on Robot Learning, pp. 2226–2240. PMLR (2023)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Q., Jia, X., Wang, S., & Yan, J.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yan, Junchi
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2024-11-24
Pages
142-158
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4404654834
Cited by
42
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 2
FWCI
12.34
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Keywords
autonomous driving, reinforcement learning, latent world models, model-based reinforcement learning, corner cases, driving scenarios, training efficiency, benchmark

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review