The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Individual Differences in Search Behavior For a Nondurable
Abstract
Subjects acquired information on, chose, and consumed one of five health breads once a week for six weeks. The effects of individual differences on information acquisition and recall of package information were studied. Experience during the experiment was highly related to the amount of external search and recall of package information. Information-processing style was also related to external search.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dimensions of Consumer Expertise
Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209080 · Cited by 4,375
Huang, P., Lurie, N. H., & Mitra, S. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.2.55 · Cited by 760
Perceived risk: The concept and its measurement
Dowling, G. R. (1986) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.4220030307 · Cited by 551
A Model of Tourist Information Search Behavior
Fodness, D., & Murray, B. (1999) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/004728759903700302 · Cited by 531
Lin, L., & Chen, C. (2006) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363760610681655 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, W. L., & Lehmann, D. R.
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Nature
- Published
- 1980-12-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 296-296
- OpenAlex
- W2044398113
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 76.67
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual Differences in Search Behavior For a Nondurable. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-031-88060-5_5
- The paper
- Moore, W. L., & Lehmann, D. R. (1980). Individual Differences in Search Behavior For a Nondurable. Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-88060-5_5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
