Cited by 13Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

AI agents in healthcare

Huang, Ken·2025·Progress in IS

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-90026-6_10

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, K.
Corresponding author
Huang, Ken
Venue
Progress in IS
Published
2025
Pages
303-321
ISSN
  • 2196-8705 (ISSN-L)
  • 2196-8713
OpenAlex
W4411152587
Cited by
13
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 2
FWCI
21.08
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Progress in IS (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
AI agents, health care, clinical decision support, medical diagnostics, drug discovery, administrative workflow, patient engagement, preventive medicine, sepsis treatment, clinical trial recruitment, predictive analytics, mental health support, multi-agent systems, natural language processing, wearable devices, robotic surgery, AI ethics and regulation, personalized medicine, global health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review