Cited by 2Machine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

LLM-driven medical document analysis: Enhancing trustworthy pathology and differential diagnosis

Open access
Kang, Lei, Fu, Xuanshuo, Terrades, Oriol Ramos, Vazquez-Corral, Javier, Valveny, Ernest, Karatzas, Dimosthenis·2026·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-032-04624-6_36

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kang, L., Fu, X., Terrades, O. R., Vazquez-Corral, J., Valveny, E., & Karatzas, D.
Affiliations
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Kang, Lei
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2025-09-17
Pages
613-628
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4414254257
Cited by
1
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.96
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
differential diagnosis, large language models, Llama 3, low-rank adaptation, explainable AI, privacy-preserving AI, web-based diagnostic platform

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review