The Agentic AI Mindset – A Practitioner’s Guide to Architectures, Patterns, and Future Directions for Autonomy and Automation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A common set of core components includes perception and world modeling, memory, planning/reasoning/goal decomposition, execution/actuation, reflection/evaluation, and communication/orchestration/autonomy.
“A common set includes the following: - Perception and world modeling-Ingests and structures external inputs (e.g., text, sensors, APIs) into internal representations [41,95]. - Memory (Short-Term, Long-Term, Episodic)-Stores short- and long-term knowledge; retrieval/promotion rules connect past to present reasoning [39,95]. - Planning, Reasoning, and Goal Decomposition-Transforms goals into action”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
A supervisor/orchestrator decomposes high-level goals into subtasks and delegates them to role-specialized sub-agents, each of which executes locally using a compact ReAct-style loop, with optional evaluation and memory, while an optional shared/federated state maintains coherence across agents.
“A supervisor/orchestrator as shown in Figure 6 decomposes high-level goals into subtasks and delegates them to role-specialized sub-agents, each of which executes locally using a compact ReAct-style loop, perception → reason/plan → act/execute, with optional evaluation and memory, while an optional shared/federated state maintains coherence across agents [47,50,95].”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
This architecture is well-suited to decomposable, multi-stage tasks that benefit from parallel specialization and clear ownership; it improves scalability via hierarchical delegation but incurs coordination overhead and risks a supervisor bottleneck/single point of failure if the controller is not engineered for throughput, fault-tolerance, and observability.
“This architecture is well-suited to decomposable, multi-stage tasks that benefit from parallel specialization and clear ownership; it improves scalability via hierarchical delegation but incurs coordination overhead and risks a supervisor bottleneck/single point of failure if the controller is not engineered for throughput, faulttolerance, and observability [47,50,95].”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
Hierarchical/HRL models scale well for decomposable tasks through multi-level goal delegation.
“hierarchical/HRL models scale well for decomposable tasks through multi-level goal delegation”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
Centralized supervisors simplify accountability and debugging but may bottleneck or introduce single-point-of-failure risk.
“Centralized supervisors simplify accountability and debugging but may bottleneck or introduce single-point-of-failure risk”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
Integrating components with an explicit workflow graph improves robustness under non-determinism.
“Regardless of centralization, integrating components with an explicit workflow graph improves robustness under non-determinism.”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
Many systems elevate an LLM to a supervisor role that maintains shared context, routes tasks to specialist modules/agents (planner, retriever, executor, critic), triggers reflection or replanning, and arbitrates conflicts among goals.
“Centralized orchestration: Many systems elevate an LLM to a supervisor role that maintains shared context, routes tasks to specialist modules/agents (planner, retriever, executor, critic), triggers reflection or replanning, and arbitrates conflicts among goals.”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
The supervisor executes a graph (DAG/state machine) with branching, retries, compensations, and evaluator hooks at critical transitions to keep lineage auditable and side effects idempotent.
“The supervisor executes a graph (DAG/state machine) with branching, retries, compensations, and evaluator hooks at critical transitions to keep lineage auditable and side effects idempotent [42,50,97].”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
Decentralized flows increase resilience and throughput but require stronger state contracts, message protocols, and observability.
“decentralized flows increase resilience and throughput but require stronger state contracts, message protocols, and observability [42,47,50]”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
Graph-based orchestration frameworks and multi-agent planning protocols are frequently reported to improve robustness under non-determinism while preserving transparency for operators.
“Graph-based orchestration frameworks and multi-agent planning protocols are frequently reported to improve robustness under non-determinism while preserving transparency for operators [41,42,50,96].”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
Hierarchical/HRL models risk supervisor bottlenecks.
“though they risk supervisor bottlenecks [50,96]”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
Autonomous software development and multi-domain digital task agents will plan, assign, execute, and self-correct the software development, browsing, coding, and file operations associated with a release.
“Autonomous software development and multi-domain digital task agents will plan, assign, execute, and self-correct the software development, browsing, coding, and file operations associated with a release [50,113].”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
Self-reflective models like SELF-REFINE can improve their behaviors by reviewing their own actions to create their improvement without relying on outside parties when past outputs have been wrong.
“In scenarios where the past outputs have been wrong, self-reflective models like SELF-REFINE [50] can improve their behaviors by reviewing their own actions to create their improvement without relying on outside parties.”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
Workflow-centric evaluation considers evaluating the full decision-making process from perception to reasoning to acting rather than just evaluating the end product.
“Workflow-centric evaluation [50] considers evaluating the full decision-making process from perception to reasoning to acting rather than just evaluating the end product.”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
Cites
Agentic AI: Autonomous intelligence for complex goals–a comprehensive survey
Acharya, D. B., Kuppan, K., & Divya, B. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3532853 · Cited by 717 · see citing works
Tool Learning with Foundation Models
Qin, Y., Hu, S., Lin, Y., Chen, W., Ding, N., Cui, G., Zeng, Z., Huang, Y., Xiao, C., Han, C., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.08354 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Incorporating Generative AI into Software Development Education
Petrovska, O., Clift, L., Moller, F., & Pearsall, R. (2024) · Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Computing Education Practice · doi:10.1145/3633053.3633057 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Liu, Y., Lo, S. K., Lu, Q., Zhu, L., Zhao, D., Xu, X., Harrer, S., & Whittle, J. (2025) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2024.112278 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bandi, A., Kongari, B., Naguru, R., Pasnoor, S., & Vilipala, S. V. (2025) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi17090404 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
- Authors
- Horne, D.
- Affiliations
- Baylor University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Horne, Dwight
- Venue
- Communications in Computer and Information Science
- Publisher
- Springer Nature Switzerland
- Published
- 2026
- Pages
- 434-455
- ISSN
- 1865-0929 (ISSN-L)
- 1865-0937
- OpenAlex
- W7118027134
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3
- FWCI
- 25.64
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Communications in computer and information science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
- Keywords
- agentic AI, autonomous agents, agent architecture, design patterns, verification and validation, AI governance, open source tools, artificial intelligence adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review