Cited by 3Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningPsychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience

The Agentic AI Mindset – A Practitioner’s Guide to Architectures, Patterns, and Future Directions for Autonomy and Automation

Horne, Dwight·2026·Communications in Computer and Information Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-032-12313-8_33

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A common set of core components includes perception and world modeling, memory, planning/reasoning/goal decomposition, execution/actuation, reflection/evaluation, and communication/orchestration/autonomy.

    “A common set includes the following: - Perception and world modeling-Ingests and structures external inputs (e.g., text, sensors, APIs) into internal representations [41,95]. - Memory (Short-Term, Long-Term, Episodic)-Stores short- and long-term knowledge; retrieval/promotion rules connect past to present reasoning [39,95]. - Planning, Reasoning, and Goal Decomposition-Transforms goals into action”
  • A supervisor/orchestrator decomposes high-level goals into subtasks and delegates them to role-specialized sub-agents, each of which executes locally using a compact ReAct-style loop, with optional evaluation and memory, while an optional shared/federated state maintains coherence across agents.

    “A supervisor/orchestrator as shown in Figure 6 decomposes high-level goals into subtasks and delegates them to role-specialized sub-agents, each of which executes locally using a compact ReAct-style loop, perception → reason/plan → act/execute, with optional evaluation and memory, while an optional shared/federated state maintains coherence across agents [47,50,95].”
  • This architecture is well-suited to decomposable, multi-stage tasks that benefit from parallel specialization and clear ownership; it improves scalability via hierarchical delegation but incurs coordination overhead and risks a supervisor bottleneck/single point of failure if the controller is not engineered for throughput, fault-tolerance, and observability.

    “This architecture is well-suited to decomposable, multi-stage tasks that benefit from parallel specialization and clear ownership; it improves scalability via hierarchical delegation but incurs coordination overhead and risks a supervisor bottleneck/single point of failure if the controller is not engineered for throughput, faulttolerance, and observability [47,50,95].”
  • Hierarchical/HRL models scale well for decomposable tasks through multi-level goal delegation.

    “hierarchical/HRL models scale well for decomposable tasks through multi-level goal delegation”
  • Centralized supervisors simplify accountability and debugging but may bottleneck or introduce single-point-of-failure risk.

    “Centralized supervisors simplify accountability and debugging but may bottleneck or introduce single-point-of-failure risk”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horne, D.
Affiliations
Baylor University (US)
Corresponding author
Horne, Dwight
Venue
Communications in Computer and Information Science
Published
2026
Pages
434-455
ISSN
  • 1865-0929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-0937
OpenAlex
W7118027134
Cited by
3
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
25.64
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communications in computer and information science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
Keywords
agentic AI, autonomous agents, agent architecture, design patterns, verification and validation, AI governance, open source tools, artificial intelligence adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review