CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1Artificial Intelligence in GamesDigital Games and MediaNarrative Theory and Analysis

Understanding the Kaleidoscopic Nature of Interactive Digital Narratives Through Repeat Experience

Mitchell, Alex·2026·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-032-12408-1_1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-032-12408-1_1

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Buckles, M.A.: Interactive fiction: the computer Storygame “ADVENTURE.” University of California, San Diego (1986)
  2. Calinescu, M.: Rereading. Yale University Press (1993)
  3. Ciccoricco, D.: Repetition and Recombination: Reading Network Fiction: a Thesis Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English in the University of Canterbury. (2005)
  4. Douglas, J.Y.: “How do I stop this thing?”: closure and indeterminacy in interactive narratives. In: Landow, G. (ed.) Hyper/text/theory, pp. 159–188. Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore, MD (1994)
  5. Herman, D.: Basic elements of narrative. Wiley (2011)
  6. Mitchell, A., McGee, K.: Reading again for the first time: a model of rereading in interactive stories. In: Oyarzun, D. et al. (eds.) Interactive Storytelling, pp. 202–213 Springer Berlin/Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34851-8-20 · DOI
  7. Murray, J.: From game-story to cyberdrama. In: Wardrip-Fruin, N., Harrigan, P. (eds.) First person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game, pp. 2–11 The MIT Press (2004)
  8. Murray, J.H.: Hamlet on the holodeck: the future of narrative in cyberspace. The MIT Press (1998)
  9. Reed, A.: Changeful tales: design-driven approaches toward more expressive Storygames. University of California, Santa Cruz (2017)
  10. Ryan, M.L.: Avatars of story. University of Minnesota Press (2006)
  11. Wardrip-Fruin, N.: Expressive processing: digital fictions, computer games, and software studies. The MIT Press (2009)
  12. Wimsatt, W.K., Beardsley, M.C.: The intentional fallacy. The verbal icon: studies in the meaning of poetry, vol. 3, p. 18 (1954)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitchell, A.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Mitchell, Alex
ORCID
Mitchell, Alex
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Published
2025-12-01
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-3-032-12408-1_1
OpenAlex
W4416855504
Semantic Scholar
34fdeebc701c171138e58e810c123dec22fcfba5
Cited by
0
References
28
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
Keywords
interactive digital narratives, replay, player choice, narrative variation, player perspective

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review