Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detecting Knowledge Inconsistencies Across Text, Tables, and Knowledge Graphs

Wei, Fanfu, Ehrhart, Thibault, Troncy, Raphaël·2027·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-032-41614-8_5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-032-41614-8_5

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Akhtar, M., Pang, C., Marzoca, A., Altun, Y., Eisenschlos, J.M.: TANQ: an open domain dataset of table answered questions. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 13, 461–480 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00749. https://aclanthology.org/2025.tacl-1.23/ · DOI
  2. Amouyal, S., Wolfson, T., Rubin, O., Yoran, O., Herzig, J., Berant, J.: QAMPARI: a benchmark for open-domain questions with many answers. In: 3rd Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Evaluation, and Metrics, pp. 97–110. Association for Computational Linguistics, Singapore (2023). https://aclanthology.org/2023.gem-1.9/
  3. Brown, T.B., et al.: Language models are few-shot learners. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901 (2020). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Abstract.html
  4. Cattan, A., et al.: DRAGged into conflicts: detecting and addressing conflicting sources in search-augmented LLMs (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08500 · arXiv
  5. Chen, W., Chang, M.W., Schlinger, E., Wang, W., Cohen, W.: Open question answering over tables and text. In: 9th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2021)
  6. Chen, W., Zha, H., Chen, Z., Xiong, W., Wang, H., Wang, W.Y.: HybridQA: a dataset of multi-hop question answering over tabular and textual data. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP, pp. 1026–1036. Association for Computational Linguistics (2020). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.91. https://aclanthology.org/2020.findings-emnlp.91/ · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cheng, Z., et al.: HiTab: a hierarchical table dataset for question answering and natural language generation. In: 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 1094–1110. Association for Computational Linguistics, Dublin (2022). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.78. https://aclanthology.org/2022.acl-long.78/ · DOI
  8. Christmann, P., Saha Roy, R., Weikum, G.: CompMix: a benchmark for heterogeneous question answering. In: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, pp. 1091–1094. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/3589335.3651444 · DOI
  9. Djebri, A.E.A., Tettamanzi, A.G.B., Gandon, F.: Publishing uncertainty on the semantic web: blurring the LOD bubbles. In: Endres, D., Alam, M., Şotropa, D. (eds.) ICCS 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11530, pp. 42–56. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23182-8_4 · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23182-8_4
  10. Ettaleb, M., et al.: ReTaT: a unified benchmark for relation extraction across text and table. In: International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Mallorca, Spain (2026) · DOI
  11. Feng, K., Zhang, S., Chen, B., Zhao, Y., Zhao, C.: SportReason: evaluating retrieval-augmented reasoning across tables and text for sports question answering. In: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 649–662. Association for Computational Linguistics, Suzhou (2025). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.34. https://aclanthology.org/2025.emnlp-main.34/ · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.34
  12. Gao, L., et al.: The Pile: an 800 gb dataset of diverse text for language modeling (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.00027 · arXiv
  13. Herzig, J., Müller, T., Krichene, S., Eisenschlos, J.: Open domain question answering over tables via dense retrieval. In: Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 512–519. Association for Computational Linguistics (2021). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.43. https://aclanthology.org/2021.naacl-main.43/ · DOI
  14. Hou, Y., et al.: WikiContradict: a benchmark for evaluating LLMs on real-world knowledge conflicts from Wikipedia. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37 (2024). https://doi.org/10.52202/079017-3481. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2024/hash/c63819755591ea972f8570beffca6b1b-Abstract-Datasets_and_Benchmarks_Track.html · DOI · Paper page
  15. Jarnac, L., Chabot, Y., Couceiro, M.: Uncertainty management in the construction of knowledge graphs: a survey. Trans. Graph Data Knowl. 3(1), 3:1–3:48 (2025). https://doi.org/10.4230/TGDK.3.1.3. https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.3.1.3 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Jarnac, L., et al.: Wikiconflict: a new dataset for conflicting data reconciliation in knowledge graph construction. In: 13th Knowledge Capture Conference (K-CAP), pp. 215–218. Association for Computing Machinery (2025). https://doi.org/10.1145/3731443.3771371 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kwiatkowski, T., et al.: Natural questions: a benchmark for question answering research. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 7, 452–466 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00276. https://aclanthology.org/Q19-1026/ · DOI · Paper page
  18. Lewis, P., et al.: Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 9459–9474 (2020). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/6b493230205f780e1bc26945df7481e5-Abstract.html
  19. Liu, S., Semnani, S., Triedman, H., Xu, J., Zhao, I.D., Lam, M.: SPINACH: SPARQL-based information navigation for challenging real-world questions. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP, pp. 15977–16001. Association for Computational Linguistics, Miami (2024). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.938. https://aclanthology.org/2024.findings-emnlp.938/ · DOI
  20. Liu, S., et al.: Open domain question answering with conflicting contexts. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL, pp. 1838–1854. Association for Computational Linguistics, Albuquerque (2025). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-naacl.99. https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-naacl.99/ · DOI
  21. Nachshoni, E., Cattan, A., Amar, S., Shapira, O., Dagan, I.: Consensus or conflict? Fine-grained evaluation of conflicting answers in question-answering. In: 2nd Workshop on Uncertainty-Aware NLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, Vienna (2025). https://aclanthology.org/2025.uncertainlp-main.13/ · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.uncertainlp-main.13
  22. Nan, L., et al.: FeTaQA: free-form table question answering. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 10, 35–49 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00446. https://aclanthology.org/2022.tacl-1.3/ · DOI
  23. Pasupat, P., Liang, P.: Compositional semantic parsing on semi-structured tables. In: 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pp. 1470–1480. Association for Computational Linguistics, Beijing (2015). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P15-1142. https://aclanthology.org/P15-1142/ · DOI · Paper page
  24. Pérez, J., Arenas, M., Gutierrez, C.: Semantics and complexity of SPARQL. In: Cruz, I., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 30–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11926078_3 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Reimers, N., Gurevych, I.: Sentence-bert: sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks. In: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (2019) · DOI · Paper page
  26. Semnani, S., Burapacheep, J., Khatua, A., Atchariyachanvanit, T., Wang, Z., Lam, M.: Detecting corpus-level knowledge inconsistencies in Wikipedia with large language models. In: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 34839–34866. Association for Computational Linguistics, Suzhou (2025). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1765. https://aclanthology.org/2025.emnlp-main.1765/ · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1765
  27. Usbeck, R., Ngomo, A.-C.N., Haarmann, B., Krithara, A., Röder, M., Napolitano, G.: 7th open challenge on question answering over linked data (QALD-7). In: Dragoni, M., Solanki, M., Blomqvist, E. (eds.) SemWebEval 2017. CCIS, vol. 769, pp. 59–69. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69146-6_6 · DOI
  28. Usbeck, R., et al.: QALD-10 - the 10th challenge on question answering over linked data. Semantic Web (2023) · DOI
  29. Vrandečić, D., Krötzsch, M.: Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledgebase. Commun. ACM 57(10), 78–85 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  30. Walter, S., Bast, H.: GRASP: generic reasoning and SPARQL generation across knowledge graphs. In: 24th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), pp. 271–289. Springer, Nara (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-09527-5_15 · DOI
  31. Wan, A., Wallace, E., Klein, D.: What evidence do language models find convincing? In: 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 7663–7695. Association for Computational Linguistics, Bangkok, Thailand (2024). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.403 · DOI
  32. Wang, H., Prasad, A., Stengel-Eskin, E., Bansal, M.: Retrieval-augmented generation with conflicting evidence. In: 2nd Conference on Language Modeling (2025). https://openreview.net/forum?id=z1MHB2m3V9
  33. Wei, F., Ehrhart, T., Troncy, R.: From rows to narratives: benchmarking semantic relatedness across tables and paragraphs. In: International Workshop on Extraction from Triplet Text-Table-Knowledge Graph (TRIPLET) (2026)
  34. Wolfson, T., et al.: MoNaCo: more natural and complex questions for reasoning across dozens of documents. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 14, 23–46 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl.a.64. https://aclanthology.org/2026.tacl-1.2/ · DOI
  35. Xu, R., et al.: Knowledge conflicts for LLMs: a survey. In: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2024), pp. 8541–8565. Association for Computational Linguistics, Miami (2024). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.486. https://aclanthology.org/2024.emnlp-main.486/ · DOI
  36. Xu, S., et al.: Fine-tuned LLMs know more, hallucinate less with few-shot sequence-to-sequence semantic parsing over Wikidata. In: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 5778–5791. Association for Computational Linguistics, Singapore (2023). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.353. https://aclanthology.org/2023.emnlp-main.353/ · DOI
  37. Yang, A., et al.: Qwen3 technical report (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09388 · arXiv
  38. Yih, W.t., Chang, M.W., He, X., Gao, J.: Semantic parsing via staged query graph generation: Question answering with knowledge base. In: 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pp. 1321–1331. Association for Computational Linguistics, Beijing (2015). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P15-1128. https://aclanthology.org/P15-1128/ · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Wei, F., Ehrhart, T., & Troncy, R.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Published
2026-10-16
Pages
78-96
ISSN
  • 0302-9743
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-3-032-41614-8_5
Cited by
0
References
4
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting Knowledge Inconsistencies Across Text, Tables, and Knowledge Graphs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-032-41614-8_5
The paper
Wei, F., Ehrhart, T., & Troncy, R. (2027). Detecting Knowledge Inconsistencies Across Text, Tables, and Knowledge Graphs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-41614-8_5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.