The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk Assessment and Animal Models of Anxiety
Abstract
Analysis of the pattern of defensive behaviours in semi-natural situations suggests a long-duration process in which high level freezing/movement arrest gradually gives way to active risk assessment activities, terminating with a gradual return to nondefensive behaviours. Risk assessment is conceptualized as the key feature in this process, with the information obtained by these oriented scanning and exploratory activities providing feedback to reduce the subject’s initial high level of defensiveness. Risk assessment measures derived from this analysis are selectively responsive to classic anxiolytics. Examination of a range of commonly used measures of anxiolytic action suggest that many of these contain clear elements of the risk assessment process. Furthermore, variation in the results obtained in these tests might be profitably analyzed in terms of some of the features of risk assessment and other aspects of the defense pattern seen to partial or potential threat stimuli.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antipredator defensive behaviors in a visible burrow system
Blanchard, R. J., & Blanchard, D. C. (1989) · Journal of comparative psychology · doi:10.1037/0735-7036.103.1.70 · Cited by 663
Self-citationConditioned fear as revealed by magnitude of startle response to an auditory stimulus.
Brown, J. S., Kalish, H. I., & Farber, I. E. (1951) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0060166 · Cited by 637
Defensive behaviors of laboratory and wild Rattus norvegicus..
Blanchard, R. J., Flannelly, K. J., & Blanchard, D. C. (1986) · Journal of comparative psychology · doi:10.1037/0735-7036.100.2.101 · Cited by 405
Self-citation
Cited by
A modern learning theory perspective on the etiology of panic disorder.
Bouton, M. E., Mineka, S., & Barlow, D. H. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.4 · Cited by 1,017
Anxiety, defence and the elevated plus-maze
Rodgers, R. J., & Dalvi, A. (1997) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(96)00058-9 · Cited by 991
Self-citationCholeris, E. (2001) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00011-2 · Cited by 758
Animal models of anxiety and depression: how are females different?
Palanza, P. (2001) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00010-0 · Cited by 542
Mouse defensive behaviors: pharmacological and behavioral assays for anxiety and panic
Blanchard, D. (2001) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00009-4 · Cited by 461
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Blanchard, D. C., Blanchard, R. J., & Rodgers, R. J.
- Venue
- Animal Models in Psychopharmacology
- Publisher
- Birkhäuser Basel
- Published
- 1991
- Pages
- 117-134
- OpenAlex
- W2103243304
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.48
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk Assessment and Animal Models of Anxiety. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-0348-6419-0_13
- The paper
- Blanchard, D. C., Blanchard, R. J., & Rodgers, R. J. (1991). Risk Assessment and Animal Models of Anxiety. Animal Models in Psychopharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-6419-0_13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.