The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen
Abstract
Es wurde beschlossen, drei verschiedene Indices anzufertigen:
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evolution of secondary metabolites from an ecological and molecular phylogenetic perspective
Wink, M. (2003) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(03)00300-5 · Cited by 1,449
Psidium guajava: A review of its traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology
Gutiérrez, R. M. P., Mitchell, S., & Solis, R. V. (2008) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2008.01.025 · Cited by 937
Chemical, pharmacological and clinical profile of the East Asian medical plant Centella aslatica
Brinkhaus, B., Lindner, M., Schuppan, D., & Hahn, E. G. (2000) · Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/s0944-7113(00)80065-3 · Cited by 525
Changes in the Levels of Plant Secondary Metabolites Under Water and Nutrient Stress
Gershenzon, J. (1984) · Phytochemical Adaptations to Stress · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-1206-2_10 · Cited by 441
Sesqui-, Di-, and triterpenoids as chemosystematic markers in extant conifers - A review
Otto, A., & Wilde, V. (2001) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02858076 · Cited by 434
Metadata
- Authors
- Hegnauer, R.
- Venue
- Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen
- Publisher
- Birkhäuser Basel
- Published
- 1992
- Pages
- 1-847
- OpenAlex
- W1985695686
- Cited by
- 1,166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 70.86
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-0348-8649-9_1
- The paper
- Hegnauer, R. (1992). Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen. Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8649-9_1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
