Cited by 26Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchUsability and User Interface Design

Destination Management Systems: Technical Challenges in Developing an eTourism Platform for Accessible Tourism in Europe

Michopoulou, Eleni, Buhalis, Dimitrios, Michailidis, Spyros, Ambrose, Ivor·2007·Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2007

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-211-69566-1_28

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Michopoulou, E., Buhalis, D., Michailidis, S., & Ambrose, I.
Affiliations
University of Surrey (GB)
Venue
Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2007
Published
2007-04-15
Pages
301-310
OpenAlex
W1498284820
Cited by
26
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 13 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.37
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
destination management systems, eTourism, accessible tourism, interoperability, content integration, accessible design, personalization, user requirements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review