The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quality of Experience: Advanced Concepts, Applications and Methods
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Existing literature on QoE focuses mostly on subjective human feedback of applications [21].”
From QoE in IoT: a vision, survey and future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Elasticity in Cloud Computing: State of the Art and Research Challenges
Al-Dhuraibi, Y., Paraïso, F., Djarallah, N. B., & Merle, P. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Services Computing · doi:10.1109/tsc.2017.2711009 · Cited by 410
Defining Immersion: Literature Review and Implications for Research on Audiovisual Experiences
Agrawal, S. R., Simon, A., Bech, S., Bærentsen, K. B., & Forchhammer, S. O. (2020) · Journal of the Audio Engineering Society · doi:10.17743/jaes.2020.0039 · Cited by 221
QoE in Video Transmission: A User Experience-Driven Strategy
Zhao, T., Liu, Q., & Chen, C. W. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2619982 · Cited by 171
Haptic Codecs for the Tactile Internet
Steinbach, E., Strese, M., Eid, M., Liu, X., Bhardwaj, A., Liu, Q., Al-Ja'Afreh, M., Mahmoodi, T., Hassen, R., El Saddik, A., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2018.2867835 · Cited by 166
Consumption of OTT Media Streaming in COVID-19 Lockdown: Insights from PLS Analysis
Gupta, G., & Singharia, K. (2021) · Vision The Journal of Business Perspective · doi:10.1177/0972262921989118 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Möller, S., & Raake, A.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
- Venue
- T-Labs Series in Telecommunication Services
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2014
- ISSN
- 2192-2810 (ISSN-L)
- 2192-2829
- OpenAlex
- W2500671607
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 10.52
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- T-labs series in telecommunication services (publishedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Multimedia Communication and Technology
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- quality of experience, multimedia applications, telecommunications services, user experience, service quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
