Cited by 70Computational and Text Analysis MethodsSocial Media and PoliticsWeb Data Mining and Analysis

Two 1%s don't make a whole: comparing simultaneous samples from twitter's streaming api

Joseph, Kenneth, Landwehr, Peter M., Carley, Kathleen M.·2014·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-05579-4_10

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the case of Twitter, much research relies on APIs that give access to at most 1% of the data.

    “Further, in the case of Twitter, much research relies on APIs that give access to at most 1% of the data”

    From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Joseph et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joseph, K., Landwehr, P. M., & Carley, K. M.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2014
Pages
75-83
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W185581208
Cited by
69
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
8.10
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Data Mining and Analysis
Keywords
Twitter Streaming API, sample overlap, sampling bias, technical artifacts, social media data collection, tweet popularity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review