The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Satisfiability Modulo Theories
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
de Moura, L., & Bjørner, N. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78800-3_24 · Cited by 6,595
Theory of Linear and Integer Programming
Letchford, A. N., & Schrijver, A. (2000) · The Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/253980 · Cited by 5,515
A machine program for theorem-proving
Davis, M., Logemann, G., & Loveland, D. (1962) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/368273.368557 · Cited by 3,220
Chaff: engineering an efficient SAT solver
Moskewicz, M. W., Madigan, C. F., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., & Malik, S. (2001) · Proceedings of the 38th conference on Design automation - DAC '01 · doi:10.1145/378239.379017 · Cited by 2,940
Theory of Linear and Integer Programming
Smith, D. K. (1987) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.1987.94 · Cited by 2,708
A Computing Procedure for Quantification Theory
Davis, M., & Putnam, H. (1960) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/321033.321034 · Cited by 2,647
Eén, N., & Sörensson, N. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24605-3_37 · Cited by 2,629
Baader, F., & Nipkow, T. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139172752 · Cited by 2,466
A Mathematical Introduction to Logic
(2001) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-22107-6 · Cited by 2,387
Efficiency of a Good But Not Linear Set Union Algorithm
Tarjan, R. E. (1975) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/321879.321884 · Cited by 1,403
Cited by
Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networks
Katz, G., Barrett, C., Dill, D. L., Julian, K., & Kochenderfer, M. J. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63387-9_5 · Cited by 1,706
Self-citation(2010) · Cited by 698
Alur, R., Bodik, R., Juniwal, G., Martin, M. M. K., Raghothaman, M., Seshia, S. A., Singh, R., Solar-Lezama, A., Torlak, E., & Udupa, A. (2013) · 2013 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design · doi:10.1109/fmcad.2013.6679385 · Cited by 656
Oracle-guided component-based program synthesis
Jha, S., Gulwani, S., Seshia, S. A., & Tiwari, A. (2010) · Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 1 · doi:10.1145/1806799.1806833 · Cited by 510
SoK: Computer-Aided Cryptography
Barbosa, M., Barthe, G., Bhargavan, K., Blanchet, B., Cremers, C., Liao, K., & Parno, B. (2021) · 2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp40001.2021.00008 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Barrett, C., & Tinelli, C.
- Venue
- Handbook of Model Checking
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 305-343
- OpenAlex
- W1481397690
- Cited by
- 1,122
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 250.36
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Satisfiability Modulo Theories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-319-10575-8_11
- The paper
- Barrett, C., & Tinelli, C. (2018). Satisfiability Modulo Theories. Handbook of Model Checking. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10575-8_11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
