The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FAtiMA Modular: Towards an Agent Architecture with a Generic Appraisal Framework
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Based on this theory, the FAtiMA architecture offers a generic appraisal framework where a set of different basic emotions and the coping behaviors can be generated according to a set of goals, preferences and action tendencies predefined for a virtual agent.”
From Usability and acceptability assessment of an empathic virtual agent to prevent major depression (2016) · cites this paper as Dias, et al., 2014
Citations
Cites
The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571299 · Cited by 6,208
Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research
(2001) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195130072.001.0001 · Cited by 2,384
Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research.
Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, T. (2001) · Cited by 1,896
Appraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions.
Roseman, I. J., Spindel, M. S., & Jose, P. E. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.899 · Cited by 827
EMA: A process model of appraisal dynamics
Marsella, S. C., & Gratch, J. (2009) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.03.005 · Cited by 452 · cited 6×
“To do so, EMA uses a representation built on the causal representations created by decision-theoretic planning, which are capable of easily capturing concepts such as utility and probability that can be directly translated to appraisal variables such as desirability and likelihood.”
MethodInfluentialThe Cognitive Structure of Emotions
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108934053 · Cited by 376
Computational models of emotion
Marsella, Gratch, & Petta (2010) · Cited by 264
Feeling and Reasoning: A Computational Model for Emotional Characters
Dias, J., & Paiva, A. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11595014_13 · Cited by 220
Self-citationLEARNING BY FEELING: EVOKING EMPATHY WITH SYNTHETIC CHARACTERS
Paiva, A., Dias, J., Sobral, D., Aylett, R. S., Woods, S. N., Hall, L. E., & Zoll, C. (2005) · Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/08839510590910165 · Cited by 196
Self-citationBut that was in another country: agents and intercultural empathy
Aylett, R. S., Vannini, N., Andre, E., Paiva, A., Enz, S., & Hall, L. E. (2009) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems · doi:10.65109/sydr1524 · Cited by 106
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lazarus, R.S.: Psychological Stress and the Coping Processes. McGraw Hill, New York (1966)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–210 of 210
Modelling Emotion and Social Dynamics of Non-Player Characters in a Multiplayer Role-Playing GamePreprint
Brival, C., & ElSayed, S. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5358769
Collective Emotions: Integrating Personality, Appraisal, and Contagion in Affective Games
Sekhavat, Y. A., Roohi, S., Abdollahi, P., Dobakhti, L., & Dadjoo, M. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3650605
황중규, & Park, S.-K. (2026) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-026-01411-0
Don, D. S. W., André, E., Dietz, M., Mertes, S., & Lingenfelser, F. (2026) · Künstliche Intell. · doi:10.1007/s13218-026-00918-y · Cited by 1
Gervás, P., & Méndez, G. (2026) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app16168218
Pavliuchenkov, D., & Gubanov, D. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-39395-1_35
Santos, G. M., Julia, R. M. S., & Nascimento, M. (2026) · Simpósio Brasileiro de Jogos e Entretenimento Digital (SBGames) · doi:10.5753/sbgames.2026.25637
Chaidi, I., Pergantis, P., Vlotinou, P., Papanastasiou, G., Skianis, C. A., Καραγιαννίδης, Χ., & Drigas, A. S. (2026) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers15100741
Annotating Characters' Emotions in Drama.
Damiano, R., Cristina Battaglino, A., Lombardo, V., & Pizzo, A. (2013) · Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin)
Metadata
- Authors
- Dias, J., Mascarenhas, S., & Paiva, A.
- Affiliations
- Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Investigação e Desenvolvimento (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Dias, João
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2014
- Pages
- 44-56
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W263876593
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 13
- FWCI
- 15.70
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Keywords
- emotional agents, appraisal theory, agent architecture, modular architecture, appraisal framework, agent behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
