Cited by 57Teaching and Learning ProgrammingInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsLiteracy, Media, and Education

Supporting Diverse and Creative Collaboration in the Scratch Online Community

Roque, Ricarose, Rusk, Natalie, Resnick, Mitchel·2016·Mass Collaboration and Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-13536-6_12

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roque, R., Rusk, N., & Resnick, M.
Affiliations
MIT Media Lab (US)
Corresponding author
Roque, Ricarose
Venue
Mass Collaboration and Education
Published
2016
Pages
241-256
OpenAlex
W2337187724
Cited by
57
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5
FWCI
17.81
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
Keywords
Scratch, online communities, co-creation, emergent collaboration, youth media production, game design, role play, communities of interest, design-based learning, motivation, computer-supported collaborative learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review