Cited by 11Digital Humanities and ScholarshipClassical Studies and PhilologyTopic Modeling

Developing Onomastic Gazetteers and Prosopographies for the Ancient World Through Named Entity Recognition and Graph Visualization: Some Examples from Trismegistos People

Open access
Broux, Yanne, Depauw, Mark·2015·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-15168-7_38

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Taken together with Greek papyri written at the site, the evidence strongly suggests that at least some inhabitants of Abusir el-Meleq were literate in, and able to speak, Greek.

    “Taken together with the multitude of Greek papyri that were written at the site, this evidence strongly suggests that at least some inhabitants of Abusir el-Meleq were literate in, and able to speak, Greek45.”

    From Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes suggest an increase of Sub-Saharan African ancestry in post-Roman periods (2017) · cites this paper as [45]

    The paper’s §2.3 discusses Demotic letters from Elephantine, not Greek papyri from Abusir el-Meleq. Searches for Abusir el-Meleq, Greek papyri written at the site, and Greek literacy or speech found no passage addressing the claim. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Similar methods are applied in e.g. Klein, L.F.: The Image of Absence: Archival Silence, Data Visualization, and James Hemmings. American Literature 85:4, pp. 661-688 (2013)
  2. Bolikowski, V. Casarosa, P. Goodale, N. Houssos, P. Manghi, J. Schirrwagen (eds.), Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries -TPDL 2013 Selected Workshops. CCIS, vol. 416, pp. 40-52. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
  3. Nadeau, D., Sekine, S.: A Survey of Named Entity Recognition and Classification. Linguisticae Investigationes 30:1, pp. 3-26 (2007)
  4. van Hooland, S., De Wilde, M., Verborgh, R., Steiner, T., Van de Walle, R.: Exploring Entity Recognition and Disambiguation for Cultural Heritage Collections. Literary and Linguistics Computing. The Journal of Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, (2014) (forthcoming)
  5. Depauw, M., Van Beek, B.: People in Greek Documentary Papyri. First Results of a Research Project. Journal of Juristic Papyrology 39, pp. 31-47 (2009)
  6. Depauw, M., Clarysse, W.: How Christian was Fourth-Century Egypt? Onomastic Perspectives on Conversion. Vigilae Christianae: A Review of Early Christian Life and Language 67, pp. 407-435 (2013)
  7. Jennes, G.: Inspired by the Gods: Theophoric Names in the Late and Graeco-Roman Periods in Egypt. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Leuven (2012)
  8. Our approach leans toward the methods applied by Rossi et al. to a large database of French notarial acts from the 13th-18th centuries: Rossi, F., Villa-Vialaneix, N., Hautefeullie, F.: Exploration of a Large Database of French Notarial Acts with Social Network Methods. Digital Medievalist 9 (2013) (http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/journal/9/villavialaneix/)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Broux, Y., & Depauw, M.
Affiliations
  • Research Foundation - Flanders (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Broux, Yanne
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2015
Pages
304-313
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W599442991
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
20.17
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Digital Humanities and Scholarship
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
prosopography, named entity recognition, social network analysis, network visualization, Ancient Greek, ancient Latin, Demotic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review