Technology and Feedback Design
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GenAI could expand feedback delivery beyond text and graphics to include narrated audio and video.
“GenAI could also expand feedback delivery beyond text and graphics to include narrated audio and video, addressing the scalability challenges of these formats and leveraging their benefits for enhanced feedback efficiency and student engagement [46].”
From Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning (2024) · cites this paper as [46]
Cites
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · see citing works
Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider
van Popta, E., Kral, M., Camp, G., Martens, R. L., & Simons, P. R.-J. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.10.003 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Bias in grading: A meta-analysis of experimental research findings
Malouff, J. M., & Thorsteinsson, E. B. (2016) · Australian Journal of Education · doi:10.1177/0004944116664618 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
A. DePaolo, C., & Wilkinson, K. (2014) · Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning · doi:10.28945/2057 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Jiang, J., & Yu, Y. (2014) · International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education · doi:10.4018/ijicte.2014070103 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning
Yan, L., Greiff, S., Teuber, Z., & Gašević, D. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-02004-5 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Ryan, T., Mahoney, P., Boud, D., Phillips, M., & Molloy, E.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Dawson, Phillip
- ORCID
- Venue
- Learning, Design, and Technology
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 695-739
- OpenAlex
- W4387639304
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 26.73
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- feedback, automated feedback, intelligent tutoring systems, peer feedback, digital recording, student learning, feedback control design, educational technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
