Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most studies that examine the effect of peer assessment tend to only assess the impact on the assessee and not the assessor.
“It is somewhat surprising that most studies that examine the effect of peer assessment tend to only assess the impact on the assessee and not the assessor (van Popta et al. 2017).”
From The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies (2020) · cites this paper as van Popta et al. 2017
The Introduction says that most studies of peer feedback in online learning focus on effects for the receiver rather than benefits for the provider. The citing sentence broadens this observation to studies of peer assessment generally, without the online-learning qualifier; the cited passage does not establish that broader claim. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredVan Popta et al. (2017) argue that the cognitive processes involved in peer assessment, such as evaluating, explaining, and suggesting, similarly play out in online and offline environments.
“V an Popta et al. (2017) argue that the cognitive processes involved in peer assessment, such as evaluating, explaining, and suggesting, similarly play out in online and offline environments.”
From The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies (2020) · cites this paper as V an Popta et al. (2017)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · see citing works
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152 · see citing works
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882 · see citing works
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846 · see citing works
Shute, V. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313795 · Cited by 4,631 · see citing works
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285 · see citing works
Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities
Topping, K. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170598 · Cited by 2,173 · see citing works
Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology
Jonassen, D. H., Spector, M. J., Driscoll, M., Merrill, M. D., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Driscoll, M. P. (2008) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203880869 · Cited by 1,692 · see citing works
Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462 · Cited by 1,636 · see citing works
The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935 · Cited by 1,206 · see citing works
From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education.
Nicol, D. (2010) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602931003786559 · Cited by 1,060 · see citing works
Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment
Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562510600680582 · Cited by 1,034 · see citing works
Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.795518 · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: the realities of online teaching
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-1083 · Cited by 634 · see citing works
Teaching online: a practical guide
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-2209 · Cited by 623 · see citing works
Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007 · Cited by 615 · see citing works
Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing Between Postgraduate Students
Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/713611428 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Feedback Strategies for Interactive Learning Tasks
Narciss, S. (2007) · doi:10.4324/9780203880869.ch11 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
The pedagogical challenges to collaborative technologies
Laurillard, D. (2008) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-008-9056-2 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Reflective Pedagogical Thinking: How Can We Promote It and Measure It?
Langer, G. M., Simmons, J. M., Pasch, M., Colton, A. B., & Starko, A. J. (1990) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/002248719004100504 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course
Tseng, S.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.007 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding it and Doing it Well
Merry, S. P. (2016) · Innovative practice in higher education · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Nicol, D. (2009) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930802255139 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Using Peer Feedback to Enhance the Quality of Student Online Postings: An Exploratory Study
Ertmer, P. A., Richardson, J. C., Belland, B. R., Camin, D., Connolly, P., Coulthard, G. J., Lei, K., & Mong, C. J. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00331.x · Cited by 270 · see citing works
The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education
van der Pol, J., van den Berg, B. A. M., Admiraal, W. F., & Simons, P. R. J. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.001 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Self-citationESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback
Guardado, M., & Shi, L. (2007) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2007.03.002 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Web-based peer review: the learner as both adapter and reviewer
Liu, E. Z.-F., Lin, S. S. J., Chiu, C.-H., & Yuan, S.-M. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/13.940995 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
The Online Educator: A Guide to Creating the Virtual Classroom
Lynch, M. M. (2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Narciss, S. (2013) · Digital Education Review · doi:10.1344/der.2013.23.7-26 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Dunlap, J. C., & Grabinger, S. (2008) · Performance Improvement Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.2003.tb00276.x · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Smits, M. H. S. B., Boon, J., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., & van Gog, T. (2008) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820701365952 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Workload reduction in online courses: Getting some shuteye
Dunlap, J. C. (2005) · Performance Improvement Journal · doi:10.1002/pfi.4140440507 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Resituating feedback from the reactive to the proactive
Williams, B. A., Brown, T., & Benson, R. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203074336-8 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
An evaluation of the use of computer supported peer review for developing higher-level skills
Davies, R., & Berrow, T. (1998) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/s0360-1315(97)00086-9 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Guiding Principles for Peer Review:Unlocking Learners’ Evaluative Skills
Nicol, D. (2014) · Edinburgh University Press eBooks · doi:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748694549.003.0011 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Advances and Innovations in University Assessment and Feedback
McArthur, J., Anderson, C., & Entwistle, N. J. (2014) · Edinburgh University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780748694556 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
The Online Educator: A Guide to Creating the Virtual Classroom
Wall, S. A. (2003) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/s1096-7516(02)00166-5 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Feedback in Instructional Contexts
Narciss, S. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_282 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [3]3. Corgan, R., Hammer, V., Margolies, M., & Crossley, C. (2004). Making your online course successful. Business Education Forum, 58(3), 51-53.
- [24]24. Nicol, D (2013) Peer review: Putting feedback processes in students' hands. Perspectives on Pedagogy and Practice, 4(1), 111-123.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies
Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
Elshami, W., Taha, M. H., Abuzaid, M., Saravanan, C., Kawas, S. A., & Abdalla, M. E. (2021) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.1080/10872981.2021.1920090 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of education 4.0
Mukul, E., & Büyüközkan, G. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122664 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
The development of student feedback literacy: the influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback
Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1689545 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Emergency Online Learning in Low-Resource Settings: Effective Student Engagement Strategies
Abou-Khalil, V., Helou, S., Khalifé, E., Chen, M., Majumdar, R., & Ogata, H. (2021) · Education sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11010024 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Fidan, M., & Gencel, N. (2022) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331221077901 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Strengthening dialogic peer feedback aiming for deep learning in SPOCs
Filius, R. M., de Kleijn, R. A. M., Uijl, S. G., Prins, F. J., van Rijen, H. V. M., & Grobbee, D. E. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.004 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Online peer feedback patterns of success and failure in argumentative essay writing
Kerman, N. T., Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Karami, M., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2093914 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Making internal feedback explicit: exploiting the multiple comparisons that occur during peer review
Nicol, D., & McCallum, S. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1924620 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Chang, C., Panjaburee, P., Lin, H., Lai, C., & Hwang, G. (2022) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-021-10071-y · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Audio peer feedback to promote deep learning in online education
Filius, R. M., de Kleijn, R. D., Uijl, S., Prins, F., van Rijen, H. V. M., & Grobbee, D. (2019) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12363 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102160 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Classroom Assessment and Educational Measurement
Brookhart, S. M., & McMillan, J. H. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429507533 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Xiao-wei, K., & Zhang, W. (2020) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1817758 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
New Directions in Formative Feedback in Interactive Learning Environments
Goldin, I. M., Narciss, S., Foltz, P. W., & Bauer, M. I. (2017) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0135-7 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Impact of contextual and personal determinants on online social conformity
Wijenayake, S., van Berkel, N., Kostakos, V., & Gonçalves, J. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106302 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Guo, K., Zhang, E. D., Li, D., & Yu, S. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13540 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Chang, D., Hwang, G., Chang, S., & Wang, S. (2021) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-021-10062-z · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Technology and Feedback Design
Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Ryan, T., Mahoney, P., Boud, D. J., Phillips, M., & Molloy, E. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_124-1 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Effects of online peer assessment on higher‐order thinking: A meta‐analysis
Zhan, Y., Yan, Z., Wan, Z. H., Xiang, W., Zeng, Y., Yang, M., & Yang, L. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13310 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
A systematic review of peer assessment design elements
Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., Panadero, E., Ruiz, J. F., Warrens, M., & To, J. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09723-7 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
What aspects of online peer feedback robustly predict growth in students' task performance?
Zong, Z., Schunn, C. D., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106924 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Attitudes and awareness of regional Pacific Island students towards e-learning
Johnson, J. B., Reddy, P., Chand, R., & Naiker, M. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00248-z · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Eshuis, E. H., ter Vrugte, J., Anjewierden, A. A., Bollen, L., Sikken, J., & de Jong, T. (2019) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-019-09296-0 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Schillings, M., Roebertsen, H., Savelberg, H., van Dijk, A., & Dolmans, D. (2021) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1798889 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Digital peer assessment in school teacher education and development: a systematic review
Topping, K. J. (2023) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671522.2021.1961301 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Fu, Q.-K., Lin, C.-J., & Hwang, G.-J. (2019) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-019-00131-x · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Fang, J.-W., Chang, S., Hwang, G., & Yang, G. (2021) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-021-09990-7 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Haro, A. V., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Banihashem, S. K. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2215822 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Pi, Z., Chen, L., Zhang, X., & Yang, J. (2021) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100950 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Hsia, L., & Hwang, G. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12986 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Understanding the what and when of peer feedback benefits for performance and transfer
Yu, Q., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107857 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Alemdağ, E., & Yıldırım, Z. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104574 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Ge, Z.-G. (2019) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1677721 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Deiglmayr, A. (2017) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0355-8
Scaffolding peer-assessment skills: Risk of interference with learning domain-specific skills?
Könings, K. D., van Zundert, M. J., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.11.007 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Online self‐regulated learning and academic procrastination: A moderated mediation model
Ma, M., Li, M., Wang, Q., Qiu, A., & Wang, T. (2022) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22730 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Implementing assessment as learning in the L2 writing classroom: a Chinese case
Xiang, X., Yuan, R. E., & Yu, B. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1965539 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Zhan, Y., Wan, Z. H., & Sun, D. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104341 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Supporting the development of collaboration and feedback skills in instructional designers
Lowell, V. L., & Ashby, I. V. (2018) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-018-9170-8 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Effects of anonymity on online peer review in second-language writing
van den Bos, A. H., & Tan, E. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103638 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Comparison of Online and Face-to-Face Peer Review of Writing
Pritchard, R. J., & Morrow, D. (2017) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2017.09.006 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Engaging with multiple sources of feedback in academic writing: postgraduate students’ perspectives
Xu, L., & Zhang, T. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2161089 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Incidencia de la revisión por pares en la construcción de textos académicos a nivel universitario
Pereira, M. M. B. (2021) · DELTA Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada · doi:10.1590/1678-460x202153017 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Kara, N. (2021) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.18.4.11 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Liu, X., Wang, J., & Zou, B. (2025) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101505 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Zhan, Y. (2021) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.2021393 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Sun, C., Liu, J., Razmerita, L., Xu, Y., & Qi, J. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14137789 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Strijbos, J.-W., & Wichmann, A. (2017) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0353-x · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Blended Learning as a Good Practice in ESL Courses Compared to F2F Learning and Online Learning
Wei, Z., & Zhu, C. (2019) · International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning · doi:10.4018/ijmbl.2020010105 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Crosthwaite, P. R., Sanhueza, A. X. G., & Schweinberger, M. (2021) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101021 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Vrieling, E., Henderikx, M., Nadolski, R. J., & Kreijns, K. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.793798 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Does anonymity matter? Examining quality of online peer assessment and students' attitudes
Kobayashi, M. (2020) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.4694 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Furthermore, Van Popta et al. (2017) maintain that online peer assessment benefits not only the recipient of feedback but also the provider of feedback, if students are required to use high level of cognitive skills, involving “an evaluative judgement, a suggestion for improvement, and an…”
BackgroundInfluentialHutt, S. J., DePiro, A., Wang, J., Rhodes, S., Baker, R. S., Hieb, G., Sethuraman, S., Ocumpaugh, J. L., & Mills, C. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3636555.3636850 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Online Learning in Pandemic Times
Chang, H. S. (2020) · Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala · doi:10.18662/rrem/12.2sup1/296 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Zeng, X., & Ravindran, L. (2024) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101691 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Supportive Peer Feedback in Tertiary Education: Analysis of Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions
Ortíz, D. C., Nogué, L., Serra, T., & Colomer, J. (2019) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci9040280 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Chen, W., & Gao, J. (2024) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2022.2043381 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Developing a Formative Assessment Protocol to Support Professional Growth
Wylie, E. C., & Lyon, C. J. (2020) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1080/10627197.2020.1766956 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Chen, W., Hu, H., Lyu, Q., & Zheng, L. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.13078 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Liu, C., Hwang, G., Yu, P., Tu, Y.-F., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-025-10484-z · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Characteristics of productive feedback encounters in online learning
Jensen, L. X., Bearman, M., & Boud, D. J. (2023) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2023.2213168 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Öztürk, M., Yüce, E., & Türker, P. M. (2025) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-024-09812-8 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Teaching sourcing during online inquiry – adolescents with the weakest skills benefited the most
Hämäläinen, E. K., Kiili, C., Räikkönen, E., Lakkala, M., Ilomäki, L., Toom, A., & Marttunen, M. J. (2022) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-022-09597-2 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Designing Laboratories for Online Instruction Using the iOLab Device
Leblond, L., & Hicks, M. (2021) · The Physics Teacher · doi:10.1119/10.0004886 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Peungcharoenkun, T., & Waluyo, B. (2024) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-024-00286-w · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Yu, J., Yu, S.-Q., & Chen, L. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13559 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Perspectives on online learning: Advantages and challenges in higher education
Rueda, M. M., Cerero, J. F., Fernández-Cerero, D., & Menéses, E. L. (2024) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/15011 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Overcoming Barriers for Implementing International Online Collaborative Assignments in Chemistry
McCollum, B. M., Morsch, L. A., Shokoples, B. G., & Skagen, D. (2019) · The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.1.8004 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis
Hornstein, J., Keller, M. V., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“…the internal, that is the covert, cognitive processes that learners engage in during feedback provision (i.e., explaining and evaluation processes; van Popta et al., 2017) and feedback reception (i.e., reflect and compare critical the received feedback with their own initial task solution; Nicol…”
InfluentialDindar, M., Çelik, İ., & Muukkonen, H. (2022) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-022-09621-x · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Shao, J., Cheng, L., Wang, Y., Li, K., & Li, Y. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2251040 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Dmoshinskaia, N., Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2020) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100959 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Hunt, P., Leijen, Ä., & van der Schaaf, M. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11060278 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Feedback in Postgraduate Online Learning: Perspectives and Practices
Hounsell, D. (2021) · Postdigital science and education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77673-2_3 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Alemdağ, E., & Yıldırım, Z. (2022) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-022-10115-x · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Technology and Feedback Design
Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Ryan, T., Mahoney, P., Boud, D., Phillips, M., & Molloy, E. (2023) · Learning, Design, and Technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17461-7_124 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Rompay-Bartels, I. V., & Geessink, J. (2021) · Journal of International Education in Business · doi:10.1108/jieb-07-2020-0063 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102210 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Rehman, N., Huang, X., Mahmood, A., Maqbool, S., & Javed, S. (2024) · New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development · doi:10.1155/2024/1271802 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Dispersed assessment: A novel approach to enhancing student engagement during and beyond Covid-19
Thompson, Z., Yoon, H. C., & Booth, P. (2023) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100811 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Learning as a peer assessor: evaluating peer-assessment strategies
Culver, C. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2107167 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Effects of the visual analytics of peer feedback on teachers’ TPACK development in a lesson study
Wang, A., Yu, S., Wang, M., & Chen, L. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2204354 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Student perceptions of feedback in reciprocal or nonreciprocal peer tutoring or mentoring
Byl, E., & Topping, K. J. (2023) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101304 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Praise affects the “Praiser”: Effects of ability-focused vs. effort-focused praise on motivation
Kakinuma, K., Nakai, M., Hada, Y., Kizawa, M., & Tanaka, A. (2020) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2020.1799313 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“How Did I Do?”: Giving learners effective and affective feedback
Howard, N. R. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09874-2 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Marei, A., Yoon, S. A., Yoo, J.-U., Richman, T., Noushad, N. F., Miller, K. M., & Shim, J. (2021) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems9010010 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Cao, H.-Q., & Han, C. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1326746 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Salillas, E. C., Sánchez‐Azqueta, C., Gimeno, C., & Aldea, C. (2020) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-11-2019-0287 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Online Peer Review of Oral Presentations
Ho, E. (2020) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/0033688220969280 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Constructive peer-feedback to improve language and communication skills in medical education
Janesarvatan, F., & Asoodar, M. (2024) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2024.2311834 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Shulgina, G., Costley, J., Щеглова, И. А., Zhang, H., & Sedova, N. S. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00315-8 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Facilitating Counselor Reflective Learning with a Real-time Annotation tool
Chen, T., Liu, M. X., Ding, E. Y., O'Neil, E., Agarwal, M., Kraut, R. E., & Dabbish, L. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581551 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Tan, J. S. H., Chen, W., Su, J., & Su, G. (2023) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-023-09390-4 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Gökoğlu, S., Yılmaz, F. G. K., & Yılmaz, R. (2024) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v25i4.7660 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Berg, S. A., & Moon, A. C. (2021) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/d1rp00213a · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Detecting Suggestions in Peer Assessments.
Zingle, G., Radhakrishnan, B., Xiao, Y., Gehringer, E. F., Xiao, Z., Pramudianto, F., Khurana, G., & Arnav, A. (2019) · Educational Data Mining · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Topic Modeling on Peer Interaction in Online and Mobile Learning of Higher Education: 1993–2022
Weng, A. K.-W., Chang, H.-Y., Lai, K., & Lin, Y.-B. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14080867 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Peer Feedback in Teaching and Learning
Lam, C. N. C., & Habil, H. (2021) · Pertanika journal of social science & humanities · doi:10.47836/pjssh.29.3.25 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- van Popta, E., Kral, M., Camp, G., Martens, R. L., & Simons, P. R.-J.
- Affiliations
- HAN University of Applied Sciences (NL)
- Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
- Venue
- Educational Research Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 20
- Pages
- 24-34
- ISSN
- 1747-938X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2535628851
- Semantic Scholar
- 32d4380c5c75679f86fd9eb0982f501fbf574150
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 52.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Educational Research Review (publishedVersion)
- DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- peer feedback, online learning, cognitive processes, online peer assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
