The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using Affinity Diagrams to Evaluate Interactive Prototypes
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“We connect this observation with Lee-Robbins' [31] characterization of visualization as being a means of fulfilling learning objectives.”
From Considering Visualization Example Galleries (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems
Beyer, H. R., & Holtzblatt, K. (1997) · Cited by 2,748
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-5403 · Cited by 943
Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner's Guide to User Research
Goodman, E., Kuniavsky, M., & Moed, A. (2003) · Cited by 791
Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom
Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T. M., Redström, J., & Wensveen, S. S. A. G. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication · doi:10.1109/tpc.2013.2274109 · Cited by 695
The Usability Engineering Lifecycle: A Practitioner's Handbook for User Interface Design
Mayhew, D. J. (1999) · Cited by 673
The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience
Hartson, R., & Pyla, P. S. (2012) · Cited by 659
Luff, P., & Heath, C. (1998) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/289444.289505 · Cited by 559
The usability engineering lifecycle
Mayhew, D. J. (1999) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/632716.632805 · Cited by 496
Wallace, J., McCarthy, J., Wright, P., & Olivier, P. L. (2013) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2466473 · Cited by 245
Holtzblatt, K., Wendell, J. B., & Wood, S. (2005) · Ubiquity · doi:10.1145/1066348.1066325 · Cited by 224
Klemmer, S., Newman, M., Farrell, R. J., Bilezikjian, M., & Landay, J. A. (2001) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/502348.502350 · Cited by 199
Gaver, W. W. (2011) · ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) · doi:10.1145/1978942.1979169 · Cited by 180
Designing Interactive Systems : A Comprehensive Guide to HCI, UX and Interaction Design
Benyon, D. (2010) · Cited by 169
Kuniavsky, M. (2003) · Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. eBooks · Cited by 148
Buur, J., & Soendergaard, A. (2000) · Designing Augmented Reality Environments (DARE) · doi:10.1145/354666.354673 · Cited by 148
Framing, aligning, paradoxing, abstracting, and directing
Lucero, A. (2012) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/2317956.2318021 · Cited by 82
Self-citationLuff, P., Heath, C., Norrie, M. C., Signer, B., & Herdman, P. (2004) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/1031607.1031695 · Cited by 75
Lucero, A., & Vetek, A. (2014) · International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE) · doi:10.1145/2663806.2663824 · Cited by 73
Self-citationSharing digital photographs in the home through physical mementos, souvenirs, and keepsakes
Nunes, M. N., Greenberg, S., & Neustaedter, C. (2008) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/1394445.1394472 · Cited by 64
Designing reality-based interfaces for creative group work
Geyer, F., Pfeil, U., Höchtl, A., Budzinski, J., & Reiterer, H. (2011) · Creativity and Cognition · doi:10.1145/2069618.2069647 · Cited by 59
Mobile collocated interactions
Lucero, A., Jones, M., Jokela, T., & Robinson, S. (2013) · interactions · doi:10.1145/2427076.2427083 · Cited by 58
Self-citationSupporting collaborative interpretation in distributed Groupware
Cox, D. A., & Greenberg, S. (2000) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/358916.359000 · Cited by 52
(2005) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-354051-5.x5000-9 · Cited by 47
Computer support for collaborative data analysis
Harboe, G., Minke, J., Ilea, I., & Huang, E. M. (2012) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2145204.2145379 · Cited by 33
Customer-focused design data in a large, multi-site organization
Curtis, P., Heiserman, T., Jobusch, D., Notess, M., & Webb, J. M. (1999) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/302979.303170 · Cited by 29
AffinityTable - A Hybrid Surface for Supporting Affinity Diagramming
Geyer, F., Pfeil, U., Budzinski, J., Höchtl, A., & Reiterer, H. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23765-2_33 · Cited by 28
How probes inform and influence the design process
Lucero, A., Lashina, T., Diederiks, E. M. A., & Mattelmäki, T. (2007) · Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (DPPI) · doi:10.1145/1314161.1314195 · Cited by 28
Self-citationKildal, J., Lucero, A., & Boberg, M. (2013) · International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI) · doi:10.1145/2493190.2493238 · Cited by 27
Self-citationFranklin, N. (2013) · Communication Design Quarterly · doi:10.1145/2559866.2559873 · Cited by 27
Lucero, A., Boberg, M., & Uusitalo, S. (2009) · International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE) · doi:10.1145/1690388.1690424 · Cited by 21
Self-citationGKJ: Group KJ Method Support System Utilizing Digital Pens
Miura, M., Sugihara, T., & Kunifuji, S. (2011) · IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems · doi:10.1587/transinf.e94.d.456 · Cited by 21
Studying Group Decision Making in Affinity Diagramming
Judge, T. K., Pyla, P. S., McCrickard, D. S., Harrison, S., & Hartson, H. R. (2008) · Cited by 14
MixedNotes: a digital tool to prepare physical notes for affinity diagramming
Jokela, T., & Lucero, A. (2014) · Proceedings of the 18th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Media Business, Management, Content & Services · doi:10.1145/2676467.2676478 · Cited by 9
Self-citationTwo Thousand Points of Interaction: Augmenting Paper Notes for a Distributed User Experience
Harboe, G., Doksam, G., Keller, L., & Huang, E. M. (2013) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-5499-0_12 · Cited by 6
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kawakita, J.: The original KJ method. Kawakita Research Institute, Tokyo (1991)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Review on the Mobile Applications Developed for COVID-19: An Exploratory Analysis
Islam, M. N., Islam, I., Munim, K. M., & Islam, A. K. M. N. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3015102 · Cited by 105
When XR and AI Meet - A Scoping Review on Extended Reality and Artificial Intelligence
Hirzle, T., Müller, F., Draxler, F., Schmitz, M., Knierim, P., & Hornbæk, K. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581072 · Cited by 101
Muñoz, J. E., Mehrabi, S., Li, Y., Basharat, A., Middleton, L. E., Cao, S. C., Barnett‐Cowan, M., & Boger, J. N. (2021) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/29987 · Cited by 86
A Critical Review of Concepts, Benefits, and Pitfalls of Blockchain Technology Using Concept Map
Islam, I., Munim, K. M., Oishwee, S. J., Islam, A. K. M. N., & Islam, M. N. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2985647 · Cited by 79
AI and the Future of Collaborative Work: Group Ideation with an LLM in a Virtual Canvas
He, J., Houde, S., Gonzalez, G. E., Moran, D., Ross, S., Muller, M. J., & Weisz, J. D. (2024) · Annual Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work (CHIWORK) · doi:10.1145/3663384.3663398 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Lucero, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Lucero, Andrés
- ORCID
- Lucero, Andrés
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- LNCS-9297
- Issue
- Part II
- Pages
- 231-248
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1270658374
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 72 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Keywords
- affinity diagramming, interactive prototype, prototype testing, interaction design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
