Cited by 26Social Robot Interaction and HRISpeech and dialogue systemsEmotion and Mood Recognition

Impact of Robot Actions on Social Signals and Reaction Times in HRI Error Situations

Open access
Mirnig, Nicole, Giuliani, Manuel, Stollnberger, Gerald, Stadler, Susanne, Buchner, Roland, Tscheligi, Manfred·2015·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Abstract

Human-robot interaction experiments featuring error situations are often excluded from analysis. We argue that a lot of value lies hidden in this discarded data. We analyzed a corpus of 201 videos that show error situations in human-robot interaction experiments. The aim of our analysis was to research (a) if and which social signals the experiment participants show in reaction to error situations, (b) how long it takes the participants to react in the error situations, and (c) whether different robot actions elicit different social signals. We found that participants showed social signals in 49.3% of error situations, more during social norm violations and less during technical failures. Task-related actions by the robot elicited less social signals by the participants, while participants showed more social signals when the robot did not react. Finally, the participants had an overall reaction time of 1.64 seconds before they showed a social signal in response to a robot action. The reaction times are specifically long (4.39 seconds) during task-related actions that go wrong during execution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_46

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Giuliani et al. [115,116] found that participants showed more social signals when robots violated social norms compared to when they exhibited technical failures.

    “In their further investigations [115,116], they also found that participants showed more social signals when robots violated social norms compared to when they exhibited technical failures.”

    From A Taxonomy of Social Errors in Human-Robot Interaction (2021) · cites this paper as [115]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mirnig, N., Giuliani, M., Stollnberger, G., Stadler, S., Buchner, R., & Tscheligi, M.
Affiliations
University of Salzburg (AT)
Corresponding author
Mirnig, Nicole
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2015
Pages
461-471
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2277838876
Cited by
26
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.76
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
human-robot interaction, social signals, reaction time, robot action, social norms violation, technical failure, nonverbal communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review