Cited by 133Social Robot Interaction and HRISpeech and dialogue systemsAI in Service Interactions

A Taxonomy of Social Errors in Human-Robot Interaction

Open access
Tian, Leimin, Oviatt, Sharon·2021·ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction

Abstract

Robotic applications have entered various aspects of our lives, such as health care and educational services. In such Human-robot Interaction (HRI), trust and mutual adaption are established and maintained through a positive social relationship between a user and a robot. This social relationship relies on the perceived competence of a robot on the social-emotional dimension. However, because of technical limitations and user heterogeneity, current HRI is far from error-free, especially when a system leaves controlled lab environments and is applied to in-the-wild conditions. Errors in HRI may either degrade a user’s perception of a robot’s capability in achieving a task (defined as performance errors in this work) or degrade a user’s perception of a robot’s socio-affective competence (defined as social errors in this work). The impact of these errors and effective strategies to handle such an impact remains an open question. We focus on social errors in HRI in this work. In particular, we identify the major attributes of perceived socio-affective competence by reviewing human social interaction studies and HRI error studies. This motivates us to propose a taxonomy of social errors in HRI. We then discuss the impact of social errors situated in three representative HRI scenarios. This article provides foundations for a systematic analysis of the social-emotional dimension of HRI. The proposed taxonomy of social errors encourages the development of user-centered HRI systems, designed to offer positive and adaptive interaction experiences and improved interaction outcomes.

Verified 2026-10-10 · 1 reference not checked yet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3439720

Cites

185 of 186 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

14 of 119 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Giuliani et al. [115,116] found that participants showed more social signals when robots violated social norms compared to when they exhibited technical failures.

    “In their further investigations [115,116], they also found that participants showed more social signals when robots violated social norms compared to when they exhibited technical failures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [115] 115. Nicole Mirnig, Manuel Giuliani, Gerald Stollnberger, Susanne Stadler, Roland Buchner, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2015. Impact of robot actions on social signals and reaction times in HRI error situations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, 461-471. source
    • cites [116] 116. Nicole Mirnig, Gerald Stollnberger, Markus Miksch, Susanne Stadler, Manuel Giuliani, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2017. To err is robot: How humans assess and act toward an erroneous social robot. Front. Robot. AI 4 (2017), 21. source

      The Results (§3.2.1.3; page unavailable) report an average of 1.36 social signals during social norm violations versus 1.53 during technical failures, with no statistically significant difference. The Discussion (§4; page unavailable) also reports significantly more gaze shifts, facial expressions, and head and body movements during technical failures. It notes that an earlier study found more gaze shifts during social norm violations, but that is not the finding of this cited study. (LLM, conf=0.94)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Emotional responses to a stimulus vary with time and context.

    “Emotional responses to a stimulus also vary with time and context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [110] 110. Stacy C. Marsella and Jonathan Gratch. 2009. EMA: A process model of appraisal dynamics. Cog. Syst. Res. 10, 1 (2009), 70-90. source
    • cites [134] 134. Luiz Pessoa. 2018. Emotion and the interactive brain: Insights from comparative neuroanatomy and complex sys- tems. Emot. Rev. 10, 3 (2018), 204-216. source
  • Interpretationcitation

    Distinguishing social errors and performance errors provides additional insights to how users react to HRI errors.

    “The work of Giuliani et al. [56] indicated that distinguishing social errors and performance errors provides additional insights to how users react to HRI errors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [56] 56. Manuel Giuliani, Nicole Mirnig, Gerald Stollnberger, Susanne Stadler, Roland Buchner, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2015. Systematic analysis of video data from different human-robot interaction studies: A categorization of social signals during error situations. Front. Psychol. 6 (2015), 931. source
  • Findingcitation

    To the best of our knowledge, the only recent HRI error study that distinguished social errors and performance errors is the work of Giuliani et al. [56].

    “To the best of our knowledge, the only recent HRI error study that distinguished social errors and performance errors is the work of Giuliani et al. [56].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [56] 56. Manuel Giuliani, Nicole Mirnig, Gerald Stollnberger, Susanne Stadler, Roland Buchner, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2015. Systematic analysis of video data from different human-robot interaction studies: A categorization of social signals during error situations. Front. Psychol. 6 (2015), 931. source
  • Premisecitation

    Giuliani et al. [56] found that participants talked more when a robot exhibited social norm violations compared to when it exhibited technical failures.

    “In particular, participants talked more when a robot exhibited social norm violations compared to when it exhibited technical failures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [56] 56. Manuel Giuliani, Nicole Mirnig, Gerald Stollnberger, Susanne Stadler, Roland Buchner, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2015. Systematic analysis of video data from different human-robot interaction studies: A categorization of social signals during error situations. Front. Psychol. 6 (2015), 931. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 99
  • May combine two claims. 52
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    People tend to trust embodied agents more than non-embodied agents.

    “In terms of the appearance of a robot, it has been identified that people tend to trust embodied agents more than non-embodied agents [173].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [173] 173. Anouk van Maris, Hagen Lehmann, Lorenzo Natale, and Beata Grzyb. 2017. The influence of a robot's embodiment on trust: A longitudinal study. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction. ACM, 313-314. source

      The Results report no significant difference in trust between the physical robot and the virtual agent. The Conclusion likewise says the study found no significant influence of embodiment on trust. Although the Introduction describes a hypothesis that users would trust the physical robot more, the study did not confirm it. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Emotional contagion focuses on the convergence of verbal and non-verbal behaviors in interpersonal communications, also known as entrainment.

    “Compared to empathy, emotional contagion focuses on the convergence of verbal and non-verbal behaviors in interpersonal communications, also known as entrainment [120].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [120] 120. Shrikanth Narayanan and Panayiotis G. Georgiou. 2013. Behavioral signal processing: Deriving human behavioral informatics from speech and language. Proc. IEEE 101, 5 (2013), 1203-1233. source

      The General discussion says people tend to become more nonverbally similar to their social partners during an interaction. It does not identify this convergence as emotional contagion, extend it to verbal behavior, or contrast emotional contagion with empathy. Its reference to entrainment appears in a cited work's title, not in an explanation of the claimed relationship. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The progressive impairment can lead to reduced memory function, reduced ability in understanding others' thoughts and emotions, altered communication, depressed and unstable mood, and feelings of isolation and loneliness.

    “The progressive impairment can lead to reduced memory function, reduced ability in understanding others' thoughts and emotions, altered communication, depressed and unstable mood, and feelings of isolation and loneliness [91].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [91] 91. Agnieszka Korchut, Sebastian Szklener, Carla Abdelnour, Natalia Tantinya, Joan Hernández-Farigola, Joan Carles Ribes, Urszula Skrobas, Katarzyna Grabowska-Aleksandrowicz, Dorota Szczęśniak-Stańczyk, and Konrad Rejdak. 2017. Challenges for service robots-Requirements of elderly adults with cognitive impairments. Front. Neurol. 8 (2017), 228. source

      The Introduction links mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer disease to difficulties with activities that depend on memory, and the Discussion addresses loneliness among older people and people with dementia. The copy does not say that progressive impairment reduces the ability to understand others’ thoughts and emotions or causes depressed or unstable mood; its discussion of communication concerns reduced opportunities with age, not an altered ability to communicate. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In psychotherapy sessions, the empathy of a therapist is a key behavioral marker for the quality and constructive outcomes of the therapy.

    “For example, in psychotherapy sessions, the empathy of a therapist is a key behavioral marker for the quality and constructive outcomes of the therapy [21].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] 21. Brian L. Burke, Christopher W. Dunn, David C. Atkins, and Jerry S. Phelps. 2004. The emerging evidence base for motivational interviewing: A meta-analytic and qualitative inquiry. J. Cog. Psychother. 18, 4 (2004), 309-322. source

      The Procedure (Toddlers’ Play with a Parent) rates parental warmth and sensitivity during toddler play, and the Results (Associations between Child and Parent Behavior Ratings and Measures of Play) relate those ratings to pretend play. Searches for psychotherapy, therapist empathy, and therapy outcomes found no passage addressing whether therapist empathy marks therapy quality or outcomes. The supplied passages have section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Norms in smiling, laughter, and expressions of positive emotions are related to the historical heterogeneity of the population in a country or a state.

    “In addition, a previous cross-cultural study found that norms in smiling, laughter, and expressions of positive emotions were related to the historical heterogeneity of the population in a country or a state [122].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [122] 122. Paula M. Niedenthal, Magdalena Rychlowska, Adrienne Wood, and Fangyun Zhao. 2018. Heterogeneity of long- history migration predicts smiling, laughter and positive emotion across the globe and within the United States. PLoS ONE 13, 8 (2018), e0197651. source

      Study 1 and Study 2 Results (pages unavailable) report associations between historical heterogeneity and smiling/laughter and positive emotion at the country and U.S. state levels. But the Measures sections describe self-reported smiling or laughter and experienced enjoyment, not norms governing those behaviors or expressions of positive emotion. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Emotion recognition and social context interpretation tasks have been applied to assess the degree of age-related social cognition decline, such as the Edinburgh social cognition test.

    “Similar to assessments of social interaction capability used in ASD, emotion recognition and social context interpretation tasks have been applied to assess the degree of age-related social cognition decline, such as the Edinburgh social cognition test [7].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] 7. R. Asaad Baksh, Sharon Abrahams, Bonnie Auyeung, and Sarah E. MacPherson. 2018. The Edinburgh social cogni- tion test (ESCoT): Examining the effects of age on a new measure of theory of mind and social norm understanding. PLoS ONE 13, 4 (2018), 1-16. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A decline in cognitive functions occurs in elderly adults due to the loss of neurons and neuronal connections in the brain.

    “A decline in cognitive functions occurs in elderly adults due to the loss of neurons and neuronal connections in the brain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [91] 91. Agnieszka Korchut, Sebastian Szklener, Carla Abdelnour, Natalia Tantinya, Joan Hernández-Farigola, Joan Carles Ribes, Urszula Skrobas, Katarzyna Grabowska-Aleksandrowicz, Dorota Szczęśniak-Stańczyk, and Konrad Rejdak. 2017. Challenges for service robots-Requirements of elderly adults with cognitive impairments. Front. Neurol. 8 (2017), 228. source

      The Introduction reports increasing cognitive impairment among older adults, and the Discussion refers to cognitive decline in the elderly. Neither section attributes that decline to the loss of neurons or neuronal connections, so the claimed cause is unsupported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Such a feeling leads to a decreased willingness to comply and increased willingness to punish when the desired outcome is not achieved.

    “Such a feeling leads to a decreased willingness to comply and increased willingness to punish when the desired outcome is not achieved [2].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] 2. Jason Aimone, Sheryl Ball, and Brooks King-Casas. 2015. The betrayal aversion elicitation task: An individual level betrayal aversion measure. PLoS ONE 10, 9 (2015), e0137491. source

      In “Previous Treatments of Betrayal Aversion” (page unavailable), the paper links non-reciprocated trust to decreased willingness to take a risky action or increased willingness to punish following the outcome. It does not describe the first response as decreased willingness to comply, so that part of the claim is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Social norms are external, socially defined normative standards that are the most socially appropriate action for a decision-maker in a given set of circumstances.

    “Social norms are external, socially defined normative standards that are the most socially appropriate action for a decision-maker in a given set of circumstances [44].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] 44. Jon Elster. 1989. Social norms and economic theory. J. Econ. Perspect. 3, 4 (1989), 99-117. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The review of human collaborative and organizational behaviors leads to additional attributes of socio-affective competence related to collaboration and prosocial behaviors, reported in Table 3.

    “Our review of human collaborative and organizational behaviors allows us to zoom out from interpersonal social interactions to collaborations within and across groups.This leads to additional attributes of socio-affective competence, which we report in Table 3.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    How HRI errors influence users' perceptions, such as trust, is yet to be understood.

    “How HRI errors influence users' perceptions, such as trust, is yet to be understood.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Previous analyses of HRI errors' impact on a user's perception have mainly focused on their influence on users' trust towards the HRI system.

    “Previous analyses of HRI errors' impact on a user's perception have mainly focused on their influence on users' trust towards the HRI system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The error types are not entirely independent from one another and can be correlated.

    “Note that the error types are not entirely independent from one another and can be correlated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    Several taxonomies of HRI errors have been proposed.

    “To better facilitate systematic analysis of errors in HRI, several taxonomies of HRI errors have been proposed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Other HRI error taxonomies have focused on the functional aspect of HRI, rather than users' perceptions of these errors.

    “Other HRI error taxonomies have focused on the functional aspect of HRI, rather than users' perceptions of these errors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Most existing HRI error studies are short-term, single-session HRI experiments, and long-term, in-the-wild HRI studies are extremely scarce.

    “Most existing HRI error studies are short-term, single-session HRI experiments.Long-term, in-the-wild HRI studies are extremely scarce [74].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [74] 74. Bahar Irfan, Aditi Ramachandran, Samuel Spaulding, Dylan F. Glas, Iolanda Leite, and Kheng Lee Koay. 2019. Per- sonalization in long-term human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI'19). IEEE, 685-686. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Emotion is an important communicative cue that humans use to express their mind and interpret others' to facilitate collaboration.

    “In Reventlov's scenario, as discussed in Section 2.1, emotion is an important communicative cue that humans use to express their mind and interpret others' to facilitate collaboration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Each category contains both instantaneous social errors that may occur in short-term HRI and social errors specific to long-term HRI.

    “Each category contains both instantaneous social errors that may occur in short-term HRI and social errors specific to longterm HRI.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Findingreasoning

    The social-emotional dimension of HRI requires further analyses.

    “Moreover, these existing taxonomies have focused on the functional dimension of HRI, while the social-emotional dimension of HRI requires further analyses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    Inspired by the 30 main attributes under five categories, the paper classifies social errors in HRI into five categories and 30 sub-categories in Table 4.

    “In particular, inspired by the 30 main attributes under five categories that humans adopt to perceive socio-affective competence and social relationships (see Section 2), we classify social errors in HRI into five categories and 30 sub-categories in Table 4.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Social skills facilitate building and maintaining human interpersonal relationships.

    “Social skills facilitate building and maintaining human interpersonal relationships, as discussed in Section 2.2.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    An error scenario can be a mix of performance errors and social errors.

    “An error scenario can be a mix of performance errors and social errors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Current social-emotional interaction functions of HRI systems are far below human-level performance, and errors are inevitable during interactions.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Understanding the influence of social norm violations may be key to advance current HRI research, especially in longitudinal scenarios where a positive human-robot relationship is desired.

    “Understanding such influence may be key to advance current HRI research, especially in longitudinal scenarios where a positive human-robot relationship is desired.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Error handling in HRI is not yet fully understood, especially regarding errors on the social-emotional dimension.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    User-centered design focuses on addressing the needs and preferences of users and the intended application scenarios of the designed systems.

    “User-centered design focuses on addressing the needs and preferences of users and the intended application scenarios of the designed systems [124].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [124] 124. Donald A. Norman and Stephen W. Draper. 1986. User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-computer Interaction. CRC Press. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The social relationship between a user and a robot relies on the perceived competence of the robot on the social-emotional dimension.

    “This social relationship relies on the perceived competence of a robot on the social-emotional dimension.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    More reliable and effective hand-eye coordination for robotic grasping can be learned through correcting errors.

    “Levine et al. [100] found that more reliable and effective hand-eye coordination for robotic grasping can be learned through correcting errors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [100] 100. Sergey Levine, Peter Pastor, Alex Krizhevsky, Julian Ibarz, and Deirdre Quillen. 2018. Learning hand-eye coordina- tion for robotic grasping with deep learning and large-scale data collection. Int. J. Robot. Res. 37, 4-5 (2018), 421-436. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    A social error may be caused by technical malfunctions, such as delayed dialogue responses, or by the imperfect design of social-emotional interaction functions of an HRI system, such as not incorporating individual variation.

    “A social error may be caused by technical malfunctions, such as delayed dialogue responses, or by the imperfect design of social-emotional interaction functions of an HRI system, such as not incorporating individual variation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Current social-emotional interaction functions of HRI systems are far below human-level performance, and errors are inevitable during interactions.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    User-centered design is commonly adopted in human-computer interaction design practices and has known benefits such as improved usability and user satisfaction.

    “It is commonly adopted in human-computer interaction design practices and has known benefits such as improved usability and user satisfaction [93].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [93] 93. Sari Kujala. 2003. User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges. Behav. Inf. Technol. 22, 1 (2003), 1-16. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In elderly care applications, HRI designs that incorporate social-emotional interactions improve health outcomes by encouraging positive moods and reducing loneliness felt by users.

    “For example, in elderly care applications, HRI designs that incorporate social-emotional interactions have been shown to improve health outcomes by encouraging positive moods and reducing loneliness felt by users [58].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [58] 58. Susel Góngora Alonso, Sofiane Hamrioui, Isabel de la Torre Díez, Eduardo Motta Cruz, Miguel López-Coronado, and Manuel Franco. 2018. Social robots for people with aging and dementia: A systematic review of literature. Telemed. e-Health 25, 7 (2018), 533-540. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Empathy allows the development of shared representations, engagement, and simulation of the subjectivity of others.

    “Empathy allows the development of shared representations, engagement, and simulation of the subjectivity of others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    A commonly used assessment of atypical social communicative functions is evaluating a person's ability to understand others.

    “A commonly used assessment of atypical social communicative functions is evaluating a person's ability to understand others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Failures in emotional interaction functions will result in HRI social errors on socio-affective competence dimensions.

    “Failures in doing so will result in HRI social errors on these socio-affective competence dimensions, which will be discussed in more detail in Section 4.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Current social-emotional interaction functions of HRI systems are far below human-level performance, and errors are inevitable during interactions.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In healthy elderly adults, impairment in social and cognitive functions may be mild and does not necessarily result in a significant decline in the quality of their personal and social life.

    “In healthy elderly adults, impairment in social and cognitive functions may be mild and does not necessarily result in a significant decline in the quality of their personal and social life [157].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [157] 157. Susanne Scheibe and Laura L. Carstensen. 2010. Emotional aging: Recent findings and future trends. J. Geront.: Series B 65, 2 (2010), 135-144. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Elderly adults with neurodegenerative diseases typically experience more severe impairment in social cognition functions, which significantly impacts their ability to maintain independence and engage in social interactions.

    “Elderly adults with neurodegenerative diseases typically experience more severe impairment in social cognition functions, which significantly impacts their ability to maintain independence and engage in social interactions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The same event or stimulus can evoke a spectrum of emotional responses in different people and can be perceived differently.

    “The same event or stimulus can evoke a spectrum of emotional responses in different people and can be perceived differently, as demonstrated in existing studies of emotion induction and annotation tasks [136].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [136] 136. Soujanya Poria, Erik Cambria, Rajiv Bajpai, and Amir Hussain. 2017. A review of affective computing: From uni- modal analysis to multimodal fusion. Inf. Fus. 37 (2017), 98-125. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The shared anchor of different definitions of empathy is the matching relation between the emotions of two people.

    “Decety and Meyer [35] also identified that the shared anchor of different definitions of empathy is the matching relation between the emotions of two people.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [35] 35. Jean Decety and Meghan Meyer. 2008. From emotion resonance to empathic understanding: A social developmental neuroscience account. Dev. Psychopathol. 20, 4 (2008), 1053-1080. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    For a robot to facilitate social interaction, it requires the ability to recognize emotions of its users, to incorporate in its decision-making process the emotions of users and artificial emotions generated by itself, and to synthesize emotional expressions according to the interaction context.

    “For a robot to facilitate social interaction, it requires the ability to recognize emotions of its users, to incorporate in its decision-making process the emotions of users and artificial emotions generated by itself, and to synthesize emotional expressions according to the interaction context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Current social-emotional interaction functions of HRI systems are far below human-level performance, and errors are inevitable during interactions.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The ability to exhibit empathy and entrainment is an important factor evaluated in various assessments of social skills, such as the Social Skills Inventory, the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test, and the Self Descriptive Inventory.

    “The ability to exhibit empathy and entrainment is an important factor evaluated in various assessments of social skills, such as the Social Skills Inventory [106], the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test [111], and the Self Descriptive Inventory [143].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [106] 106. Maurice Lorr, Richard P. Youniss, and Edward C. Stefic. 1991. An inventory of social skills. J. Personal. Assess. 57, 3 (1991), 506-520. source
    • cites [111] 111. Andrew Maul. 2012. The validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) as a measure of emotional intelligence. Emot. Rev. 4, 4 (2012), 394-402. source
    • cites [143] 143. Ronald E. Riggio. 1986. Assessment of basic social skills. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 51, 3 (1986), 649. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Entrainment can be utilized in HRI design to increase the engagement of users, as well as to improve interaction outcomes, such as users' learning outcomes under an educational robot.

    “These findings indicate that entrainment can be utilized in HRI design to increase the engagement of users, as well as to improve interaction outcomes, such as users' learning outcomes under an educational robot.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Current social-emotional interaction functions of HRI systems are far below human-level performance, and errors are inevitable during interactions.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Individuals with frontotemporal dementia have difficulties recognizing facial expressions and gaze directions.

    “For example, individuals with frontotemporal dementia [145] were found to have difficulties recognizing facial expressions and gaze directions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [145] 145. Howard J. Rosen, Katherine Pace-Savitsky, Richard J. Perry, Joel H. Kramer, Bruce L. Miller, and Robert W. Levenson. 2004. Recognition of emotion in the frontal and temporal variants of frontotemporal dementia. Dement. Geriat. Cog. Disord. 17, 4 (2004), 277-281. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    During interpersonal communications, emotions have been identified as cues that allow people to observe and perceive the latent cognitive states of their interaction partners, and to express their own internal states.

    “During interpersonal communications, emotions have been identified as cues that allow people to observe and perceive the latent cognitive states of their interaction partners, and to express their own internal states [152,175].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [152] 152. Magdalena Rychlowska, Rachael E. Jack, Oliver G. B. Garrod, Philippe G. Schyns, Jared D. Martin, and Paula M. Niedenthal. 2017. Functional smiles: Tools for love, sympathy, and war. Psychol. Sci. 28, 9 (2017), 1259-1270. source
    • cites [175] 175. Alessandro Vinciarelli, Maja Pantic, Dirk Heylen, Catherine Pelachaud, Isabella Poggi, Francesca D'Errico, and Marc Schroeder. 2012. Bridging the gap between social animal and unsocial machine: A survey of social signal processing. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 3, 1 (2012), 69-87. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    An HRI system with empathic functions leads to a better understanding of the users and is required for establishing social relationships between the system and its users.

    “Therefore, an HRI system with empathic functions leads to a better understanding of the users and is required for establishing social relationships between the system and its users.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Current social-emotional interaction functions of HRI systems are far below human-level performance, and errors are inevitable during interactions.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    For individuals with limited communicative ability, an observer's evaluation can be used to assess their development level.

    “For individuals with limited communicative ability, an observer's evaluation can be used to assess their development level.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [59] 59. Katherine Gotham, Susan Risi, Andrew Pickles, and Catherine Lord. 2007. The autism diagnostic observation sched- ule: Revised algorithms for improved diagnostic validity. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 37, 4 (2007), 613. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    ASD refers to a class of neurodevelopmental disorders.

    “ASD refers to a class of neurodevelopmental disorders [51].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51] 51. Uta Frith. 2003. Autism: Explaining the Enigma. Blackwell Publishing. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    HRI applications in mental health extend beyond ASD and elderly care, e.g., HRI for depression care.

    “HRI applications in mental health extend beyond ASD and elderly care, e.g., HRI for depression care [15].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] 15. Casey C. Bennett, Selma Sabanovic, Jennifer A. Piatt, Shinichi Nagata, Lori Eldridge, and Natasha Randall. 2017. A robot a day keeps the blues away. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI'17). IEEE, 536-540. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Current research on healthy aging has focused on identifying reliable methods to improve the emotional well-being and social functioning of individuals and preventing further decline of cognitive functions.

    “Current research on healthy aging has focused on identifying reliable methods to improve the emotional well-being and social functioning of individuals and preventing further decline of cognitive functions [157].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [157] 157. Susanne Scheibe and Laura L. Carstensen. 2010. Emotional aging: Recent findings and future trends. J. Geront.: Series B 65, 2 (2010), 135-144. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Existing HRI studies have focused on two mental health domains: interventions for individuals with impaired cognitive and social abilities and providing companionship as well as physical and mental support to individuals living on their own.

    “In particular, existing HRI studies have focused on two domains [142]: (1) interventions for individuals with impaired cognitive and social abilities and (2) providing companionship as well as physical and mental support to individuals living on their own.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [142] 142. Laurel D. Riek. 2016. Robotics technology in mental health care. In Artificial Intelligence in Behavioral and Mental Health Care. Elsevier, 185-203. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Emotions are fundamental to intelligence and interaction.

    “Our review of the functions of human emotions demonstrates that emotions are fundamental to intelligence and interaction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Researchers implemented artificial emotions in robots to improve their ability to generate adaptive behaviors.

    “Motivated by these functions of emotion, researchers implemented artificial emotions in robots to improve their ability to generate adaptive behaviors [1,117].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] 1. Carole Adam and Benoit Gaudou. 2016. BDI agents in social simulations: A survey. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 31, 3 (2016), 207-238. source
    • cites [117] 117. Thomas M. Moerland, Joost Broekens, and Catholijn M. Jonker. 2018. Emotion in reinforcement learning agents and robots: A survey. Mach. Learn. 107, 2 (2018), 443-480. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Self-reported evaluations of social interaction capabilities have been used, for example, the empathy quotient questionnaire.

    “Beyond emotion recognition tests, self-reported evaluations of social interaction capabilities have also been used; for example, the empathy quotient questionnaire [10].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] 10. Simon Baron-Cohen and Sally Wheelwright. 2004. The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 34, 2 (2004), 163-175. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A major diagnostic cue of ASD is impairment in reciprocal social interaction and communication.

    “A major diagnostic cue of ASD is impairment in reciprocal social interaction and communication [105].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [105] 105. Catherine Lord, Susan Risi, Linda Lambrecht, Edwin H. Cook, Bennett L. Leventhal, Pamela C. DiLavore, Andrew Pickles, and Michael Rutter. 2000. The autism diagnostic observation schedule-Generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 30, 3 (2000), 205- 223. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Commonly used empathy assessments include the Empathy Quotient, the Empathy Scale, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, and the Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy.

    “Commonly used empathy assessments include the Empathy Quotient [10], the Empathy Scale [76], the Interpersonal Reactivity Index [31], and the Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy [113].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [10] 10. Simon Baron-Cohen and Sally Wheelwright. 2004. The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 34, 2 (2004), 163-175. source
    • cites [76] 76. John A. Johnson, Jonathan M. Cheek, and Robert Smither. 1983. The structure of empathy. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 45, 6 (1983), 1299-1312. source
    • cites [31] 31. Mark H. Davis et al. 1980. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 10 (1980), 85. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Such tests may not apply to those with limited verbal ability or across different languages or cultures.

    “However, such tests may not apply to those with limited verbal ability or across different languages or cultures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The identified socio-affective competence attributes can be used to measure users' perception of social errors and their impacts on HRI systems.

    “These attributes can be used to measure users' perception of social errors and their impacts on such HRI systems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Current social-emotional interaction functions of HRI systems are far below human-level performance, and errors are inevitable during interactions.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Assessments with movie clips were used to capture the multimodal and context-specific nature of social interaction, such as the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition task.

    “To capture the multimodal and contextspecific nature of social interaction, assessments with movie clips were also used, such as the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition task [43].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [43] 43. Isabel Dziobek, Stefan Fleck, Elke Kalbe, Kimberley Rogers, Jason Hassenstab, Matthias Brand, Josef Kessler, Jan K. Woike, Oliver T. Wolf, and Antonio Convit. 2006. Introducing MASC: A movie for the assessment of social cognition. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 36, 5 (2006), 623-636. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Variations of economic games have been applied to evaluate the perceived prosociality of robots and a user's trust towards a robot.

    “Variations of these games have been applied to evaluate the perceived prosociality of robots and a user's trust towards a robot (e.g., Wu et al. [179]).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [179] 179. Jane Wu, Erin Paeng, Kari Linder, Piercarlo Valdesolo, and James C. Boerkoel. 2016. Trust and cooperation in human- robot decision making. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium Series.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Trust has direct impacts on human decision-making and willingness to accept information or follow instructions from robots.

    “Trust has direct impacts on human decision-making and willingness to accept information or follow instructions from robots [64].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [64] 64. Peter A. Hancock, Deborah R. Billings, Kristin E. Schaefer, Jessie Y. C. Chen, Ewart J. De Visser, and Raja Parasuraman. 2011. A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Hum. Fact. 53, 5 (2011), 517-527. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    An interesting aspect exposed by behavioral economics studies is the temporal dimension of social errors.

    “An interesting aspect exposed by behavioral economics studies is the temporal dimension of social errors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Social norms vary across cultures and individual sensitivity to social reputation.

    “Social norms vary across cultures and individual sensitivity to social reputation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The perceived socio-affective competence of a robot and social errors in HRI should also be investigated in longitudinal settings beyond short-term, single interaction sessions.

    “This indicates that the perceived socio-affective competence of a robot and social errors in HRI should also be investigated in longitudinal settings beyond short-term, single interaction sessions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Error handling in HRI is not yet fully understood, especially regarding errors on the social-emotional dimension.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The attractiveness of physical appearance and voice of agents influences trust in user-agent interaction.

    “The attractiveness of physical appearance and voice of agents was also shown to influence trust in user-agent interaction [183].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [183] 183. Beste F. Yuksel, Penny Collisson, and Mary Czerwinski. 2017. Brains or beauty: How to engender trust in user-agent interactions. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 17, 1 (2017), 2. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The public goods game measures people's prosociality and investigates how awareness of social reputation motivates prosocial behaviors.

    “The public goods game measures people's prosociality and investigates how awareness of social reputation motivates prosocial behaviors [45].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45] 45. Ernst Fehr and Urs Fischbacher. 2004. Social norms and human cooperation. Trends Cog. Sci. 8, 4 (2004), 185-190. source
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Giuliani et al.'s approach of categorizing social errors as violations to two types of social norms in dialogue is limited because social interaction is more than verbal and non-verbal communication.

    “Thus, their approach of categorizing social errors as violations to two types of social norms in dialogue is limited.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    An educational robot perceived as trustworthy and privacy-preserving may inspire stronger engagement and motivation in its students, resulting in better learning outcomes.

    “Thus, an educational robot perceived as trustworthy and privacypreserving may inspire stronger engagement and motivation in its students, resulting in better learning outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Adherence to, or violation of, social norms has mainly been studied in the context of three economic games: the public goods game, the trust game, and the dictator game.

    “Adherence to, or violation of, social norms has mainly been studied in the context of three economic games: the public goods game [96], the trust game [16], and the dictator game [80].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [96] 96. John O. Ledyard. 1994. Public goods: A survey of experimental research. Social Science Working Paper. Cali- fornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA. Retrieved on January 21, 2021 from https://resolver.caltech.edu/ CaltechAUTHORS:20170823-160736011. source
    • cites [16] 16. Joyce Berg, John Dickhaut, and Kevin McCabe. 1995. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games Econ. Behav. 10, 1 (1995), 122-142. source
    • cites [80] 80. Daniel Kahneman, Jack L. Knetsch, and Richard Thaler. 1986. Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. Amer. Econ. Rev. 76, 4 (1986), 728-741. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Three main aspects of trust have been analyzed in current HRI studies: the environment perspective, the human perspective, and the robot perspective.

    “Three main aspects of trust have been analyzed in current HRI studies: the environment perspective, the human perspective, and the robot perspective [156].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [156] 156. Kristin Schaefer. 2013. The Perception and Measurement of Human-Robot Trust. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Central Florida. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The social norms questionnaire requires an individual to assess if a behavior is appropriate or not to evaluate whether the person is overly adherent to a perceived social norm or unaware of social norm violations.

    “The social norms questionnaire requires an individual to assess if a behavior is appropriate or not to evaluate whether the person is overly adherent to a perceived social norm or unaware of social norm violations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [137] 137. K. P. Rankin. 2008. Social norms questionaire. NINDS: Domain Specific Tasks of Executive Function. Retrieved January 21, 2021 from https://memory.ucsf.edu/sites/memory.ucsf.edu/files/wysiwyg/EXAMINER_UserManual_3.6r.pdf.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Adherence to social norms is tied to a person's social reputation and perceived prosociality.

    “Adherence to social norms is tied to a person's social reputation and perceived prosociality [4].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] 4. James Andreoni and B. Douglas Bernheim. 2009. Social image and the 50-50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica 77, 5 (2009), 1607-1636. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Erratic behaviors of robots negatively influence people's trust towards them.

    “In terms of the capability of a robot, erratic behaviors of robots were shown to negatively influence people's trust towards them [176].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [176] 176. Ning Wang, David V. Pynadath, and Susan G. Hill. 2016. Trust calibration within a human-robot team: Comparing automatically generated explanations. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction. IEEE Press, 109-116. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    For each attribute of socio-affective competence identified, the judgment of whether a behavior is normative or not varies across cultural, contextual, and individual factors.

    “Note that for each attribute of the socio-affective competence we identified, the judgment of whether a behavior is normative or not varies across cultural, contextual, and individual factors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The judgment of whether a behavior is normative or not varies across cultural, contextual, and individual factors.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Sebo et al. [158] found that when a robot broke a promise, the participant indicated lower trust and exhibited retaliation, and apology was more effective than denial.

    “They found that when a robot broke a promise previously made to a participant, the participant indicated lower trust towards the robot and exhibited retaliation in later stages of the game.They studied two types of repair strategies addressing the trust violation, namely, apology and denial, and their results suggested that apology was more effective.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [158] 158. Sarah Strohkorb Sebo, Priyanka Krishnamurthi, and Brian Scassellati. 2019. "I don't believe you": Investigating the effects of robot trust violation and repair. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human- robot Interaction (HRI'19). IEEE, 57-65. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The perception of socio-affective competence is flexible and context-dependent.

    “However, the perception of socio-affective competence is flexible and context-dependent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Established trust can be violated by short instances, and the difficulty and time required for trust recovery depend on various factors, such as compensation and repair strategies.

    “However, established trust can be violated by short instances, and the difficulty and time required for trust recovery depend on various factors, such as compensation and repair strategies [38].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] 38. Pieter T. M. Desmet, David De Cremer, and Eric van Dijk. 2011. Trust recovery following voluntary or forced finan- cial compensations in the trust game: The role of trait forgiveness. Personal. Indiv. Diff. 51, 3 (2011), 267-273. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Three standardized evaluation questionnaires are widely used for dementia patients or people at risk: the interpersonal reactivity index, the social norms questionnaire, and the social behavior observer checklist.

    “In particular, three standardized evaluation questionnaires are widely used for dementia patients or people at risk, namely, the interpersonal reactivity index [30], the social norms questionnaire [137], and the social behavior observer checklist [138].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [30] 30. Mark H. Davis. 1980. Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Edwin Mellen Press.
    • cites [137] 137. K. P. Rankin. 2008. Social norms questionaire. NINDS: Domain Specific Tasks of Executive Function. Retrieved January 21, 2021 from https://memory.ucsf.edu/sites/memory.ucsf.edu/files/wysiwyg/EXAMINER_UserManual_3.6r.pdf.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [138] 138. K. P. Rankin, E. Baldwin, C. Pace-Savitsky, J. H. Kramer, and B. L. Miller. 2005. Self awareness and personality change in dementia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychia. 76, 5 (2005), 632-639. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The dictator game measures people's adherence to the fairness social norm.

    “The dictator game measures people's adherence to the fairness social norm [40].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] 40. Andreas Diekmann. 2004. The power of reciprocity: Fairness, reciprocity, and stakes in variants of the dictator game. J. Conflict Resol. 48, 4 (2004), 487-505. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The impact of socio-affective competence on collaborative behaviors has been studied intensively in behavioral economics and economic games, mainly in the context of social norms.

    “The impact of socio-affective competence on collaborative behaviors has been studied intensively in behavioral economics and economic games, mainly in the context of social norms [45].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45] 45. Ernst Fehr and Urs Fischbacher. 2004. Social norms and human cooperation. Trends Cog. Sci. 8, 4 (2004), 185-190. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Social norms are constantly changing, following the shifting expectations of the majority in a social group.

    “They are constantly changing, following the shifting expectations of the majority in a social group [87].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [87] 87. Erik O. Kimbrough and Alexander Vostroknutov. 2016. Norms make preferences social. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 14, 3 (2016), 608-638. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Trust requires time to cultivate.

    “Trust requires time to cultivate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because of the complexity in human social interaction, a robot designed to interact with people is bound to make errors.

    “Because of the complexity in human social interaction, a robot designed to interact with people is bound to make errors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The trust game measures trust and reciprocity, which accommodated indicators of cooperativeness and adherence to social norms.

    “The trust game measures trust and reciprocity [24], which accommodated indicators of cooperativeness and adherence to social norms [163].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [24] 24. David Cesarini, Christopher T. Dawes, James H. Fowler, Magnus Johannesson, Paul Lichtenstein, and Björn Wallace. 2008. Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 105, 10 (2008), 3721-3726. source
    • cites [163] 163. Dirk Sliwka. 2007. Trust as a signal of a social norm and the hidden costs of incentive schemes. Amer. Econ. Rev. 97, 3 (2007), 999-1012. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The mean time between technical failures for robots in the wild is often less than a few hours, and current HRI systems are not yet mature enough to effectively handle unexpected events.

    “The mean time between technical failures for robots in the wild is often less than a few hours, and current HRI systems are not yet mature enough to effectively handle unexpected events [70].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [70] 70. Shanee Sarah Honig and Tal Oron-Gilad. 2018. Understanding and resolving failures in human-robot interaction: Literature review and model development. Front. Psychol. 9 (2018), 861. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The interpersonal reactivity index measures empathic concerns and ability of perspective-taking.

    “The interpersonal reactivity index measures empathic concerns and ability of perspective-taking.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] 30. Mark H. Davis. 1980. Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Edwin Mellen Press.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In both social and non-social situations, humans can feel betrayed when their trust is not reciprocated or when their expectation is unsatisfied.

    “In both social and non-social situations, humans can feel betrayed when their trust is not reciprocated [81] or when their expectation is unsatisfied [55].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [81] 81. Daniel Kahneman, David Schkade, and Cass Sunstein. 1998. Shared outrage and erratic awards: The psychology of punitive damages. J. Risk Uncert. 16, 1 (1998), 49-86. source
    • cites [55] 55. Andrew D. Gershoff and Jonathan J. Koehler. 2011. Safety first? The role of emotion in safety product betrayal aversion. J. Consum. Res. 38, 1 (2011), 140-150. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The social behavior observer checklist collects a carer's observations on decreased social functions of an individual, such as showing diminished social and emotional engagement, having unstable emotional and cognitive abilities, exhibiting perseveration, or not being sensitive to others' embarrassment or privacy.

    “The social behavior observer checklist collects a carer's observations on decreased social functions of an individual, such as showing diminished social and emotional engagement, having unstable emotional and cognitive abilities, exhibiting perseveration, or not being sensitive to others' embarrassment or privacy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [138] 138. K. P. Rankin, E. Baldwin, C. Pace-Savitsky, J. H. Kramer, and B. L. Miller. 2005. Self awareness and personality change in dementia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychia. 76, 5 (2005), 632-639. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    When a robot is unable to recognize emotions of its human teammates accurately and timely, its ability to assess the joint intention of the team can be impaired, while such ability is key to effective and successful human-robot collaboration.

    “Thus, when Reventlov is unable to recognize emotions of its human teammates in an accurate and timely manner (E1.1), its ability to assess the joint intention of the team can be impaired, while such ability is key to effective and successful human-robot collaboration [13].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] 13. Andrea Bauer, Dirk Wollherr, and Martin Buss. 2008. Human-robot collaboration: A survey. Int. J. Human. Robot. 5, 01 (2008), 47-66. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The three scenarios are closely aligned with existing HRI studies under similar contexts.

    “They are are closely aligned with existing HRI studies under similar contexts, as detailed below:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    In Calvin's scenario, a breach in empathic and emotional reactions is particularly harmful because of the vulnerability of its user.

    “In Calvin's scenario, a breach in empathic and emotional reactions is particularly harmful because of the vulnerability of its user.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Scenario-based design is a widely used approach in human-computer interaction studies.

    “Scenario-based design is a widely used approach in humancomputer interaction studies [149].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [149] 149. Mary Beth Rosson and John M. Carroll. 2009. Scenario based design. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human- computer Interaction. 145-162. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These social errors in HRI apply to scenarios beyond the specific areas that they originated from, and all five types of social errors may occur in any HRI scenario.

    “Thus, these social errors in HRI apply to scenarios beyond the specific areas that they originated from, and all five types of social errors may occur in any HRI scenario.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The 30 attributes of socio-affective competence identified from human studies are applicable to a broad class of HRI scenarios and application domains.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The induction of humor can be difficult to control, and the outcome can vary for different individuals.

    “The induction of humor can be difficult to control, and the outcome can vary for different individuals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given

    The proposed taxonomy illustrates the breadth and complexity of social errors in HRI.

    “This proposed taxonomy illustrates the breadth and complexity of social errors in HRI.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Such learned adaption enables a robot to respond with empathy and over time establish a companionship with its user.

    “Such learned adaption enables a robot to respond with empathy [131] and over time establish a companionship with its user [58].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [131] 131. Ana Paiva, Iolanda Leite, Hana Boukricha, and Ipke Wachsmuth. 2017. Empathy in virtual agents and robots: A survey. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 7, 3 (2017), 11. source
    • cites [58] 58. Susel Góngora Alonso, Sofiane Hamrioui, Isabel de la Torre Díez, Eduardo Motta Cruz, Miguel López-Coronado, and Manuel Franco. 2018. Social robots for people with aging and dementia: A systematic review of literature. Telemed. e-Health 25, 7 (2018), 533-540. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The impact of the same social error may differ in short-term vs. long-term or repeated HRI, and researchers should take the temporal dimension of HRI into account when studying social errors.

    “Thus, the impact of the same social error may differ in short-term vs. longterm or repeated HRI, and researchers should take the temporal dimension of HRI into account when studying social errors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    De Graaf et al. [32] found that the robot's lack of adaptability and sociability were the two determinants of users' abandonment.

    “They found that the robot's lack of adaptability and sociability were the two determinants of users' abandonment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [32] 32. Maartje De Graaf, Somaya Ben Allouch, and Jan Van Dijk. 2017. Why do they refuse to use my robot?: Reasons for non-use derived from a long-term home study. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human- robot Interaction. ACM, 224-233. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Beane [14] found that telepresence robots were abandoned and stowed away shortly after deployment because they only served as a symbol of technological novelty and offered limited interaction and use cases.

    “It was found that the robots were abandoned and stowed away shortly after deployment, as they only served as a symbol of technological novelty and offered limited interaction and use cases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] 14. Matthew I. Beane. 2020. In storage, yet on display: An empirical investigation of robots' value as social signals. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction. 83-91. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Lee et al. [97] found that users with a socially oriented interaction goal responded best to apologies, while those with a utilitarian orientation responded best to compensation.

    “They found that users with a socially oriented interaction goal responded best to apologies, while those with a utilitarian orientation responded best to compensation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [97] 97. Min Kyung Lee, Sara Kiesler, Jodi Forlizzi, Siddhartha Srinivasa, and Paul Rybski. 2010. Gracefully mitigating break- downs in robotic services. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI'10). IEEE, 203-210. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    A robot's failure in maintaining engagement during an interaction (E4.5) can be a consequence of it generating irrelevant or incomprehensible replies to verbal or non-verbal communications of the user (E4.2).

    “For example, a robot's failure in maintaining engagement during an interaction (E4.5) can be a consequence of it generating irrelevant or incomprehensible replies to verbal or non-verbal communications of the user (E4.2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Through longitudinal interaction, a robot can learn to improve its ability to recognize the emotions of a specific person, and that person can better recognize the synthesized expressions of the robot, i.e., a mutual adaption.

    “Through longitudinal interaction, a robot can learn to improve its ability to recognize the emotions of a specific person, and that person can better recognize the synthesized expressions of the robot, i.e., a mutual adaption.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    When a robot is not able to accurately recognize a user's emotional states or exhibit empathy and entrainment, providing help and mental health care in a timely fashion becomes nearly impossible.

    “In individual short-term interaction sessions, when Calvin is not able to accurately recognize Frank's emotional states (E1.1) or exhibit empathy and entrainment (E1.5), providing help and mental health care in a timely fashion becomes nearly impossible.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Kubota et al. [92] found benefits in both usability and health outcomes when target users were included in participatory design workshops for a social robot for neurorehabilitation.

    “Their results demonstrated benefits in both usability and health outcomes of the robot.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [92] 92. Alyssa Kubota, Emma I. C. Peterson, Vaishali Rajendren, Hadas Kress-Gazit, and Laurel D. Riek. 2020. JESSIE: Syn- thesizing social robot behaviors for personalized neurorehabilitation and beyond. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction. 121-130. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Humans can experience psychological changes caused by long periods of isolation and confinement, including impaired cognitive ability, negative affect, and interpersonal tension and conflict.

    “Humans can experience psychological changes caused by such a long period of isolation and confinement, including impaired cognitive ability, negative affect, and interpersonal tension and conflict [133].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [133] 133. Lawrence A. Palinkas and Peter Suedfeld. 2008. Psychological effects of polar expeditions. Lancet 371, 9607 (2008), 153-163. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    A receptionist robot provides services to a heterogeneous population.

    “A receptionist such as Olivaw's provides services to a heterogeneous population.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The paper creates three hypothetical HRI scenarios following the ecological validity guideline, i.e., these are believable situations that approximate real-life situations.

    “We create three hypothetical HRI scenarios following the ecological validity guideline, i.e., these are believable situations that approximate real-life situations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The three hypothetical HRI scenarios are believable situations that approximate real-life situations.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    Understanding the users' interaction goals is important when designing and evaluating an HRI system.

    “This indicates the importance of understanding the users' interaction goals when designing and evaluating an HRI system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Violation of existing expectancy may also result in humor, and a breach in interaction norms may instead amuse a user and increase the memorability and enjoyment of an HRI session.

    “However, violation of existing expectancy may also result in humor [36], and a breach in the interaction norms may instead amuse a user and increase the memorability and enjoyment of an HRI session.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] 36. Lambert Deckers and John Devine. 1981. Humor by violating an existing expectancy. J. Psychol. 108, 1 (1981), 107- 110. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    In short-term HRI, a breach in empathic and emotional reactions can lead to user engagement breakdowns or failures in achieving the goal of the interaction session.

    “As discussed here, in short-term HRI, a breach in empathic and emotional reactions can lead to user engagement breakdowns or failures in achieving the goal of the interaction session.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If a robot carer appears unstable in its emotional states, it may worsen the user's condition.

    “On the contrary, if Calvin appears unstable in its emotional states (E1.3), it may worsen Frank's condition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Compared to other sub-categories of HRI errors, social norm violations require further analyses and more detailed classification.

    “However, as shown in Figure 1, compared to other sub-categories of HRI errors, social norm violations require further analyses and more detailed classification.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    These socio-affective dimensions are connected, and together they cover the multiple facets of social-emotional interaction.

    “However, these socio-affective dimensions are connected, and together they cover the multiple facets of social-emotional interaction, as discussed in Section 2.5.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Failure in establishing mutual understanding creates obstacles for team integration and lowers the efficiency of the collaboration in the long term.

    “Thus, failure in establishing mutual understanding (E1.6) creates obstacles for team integration and lowers the efficiency of the collaboration in the long term.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Scenario-based design emphasizes people and their experiences, which aligns with the user-centered perspective of the paper's taxonomy.

    “Scenario-based design emphasizes people and their experiences, which aligns with the user-centered perspective of our taxonomy of HRI social errors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A systematic and user-centered understanding of errors on the social-emotional dimension of HRI is required.

    “As discussed in Section 3, a systematic and user-centered understanding of errors on the socialemotional dimension of HRI is required.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A person visiting a reception desk for the first time will be expecting a lower intimacy level in their social interaction with a robot compared to a regular visitor.

    “For example, a person visiting the reception desk for the first time will be expecting a lower intimacy level in their social interaction with Olivaw compared to a member of the department who is a regular visitor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In the three hypothetical HRI scenarios, E1 and E2 may be more relevant to Olivaw's scenario, E3 and E4 may be more relevant to Calvin's scenario, and E5 may be more relevant to Reventlov's scenario.

    “Thus, in our three hypothetical HRI scenarios, E1 and E2 may be more relevant to Olivaw's scenario, E3 and E4 may be more relevant to Calvin's scenario, and E5 may be more relevant to Reventlov's scenario.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    In short-term interaction sessions, without emotional reaction functions, a robot can still provide basic services such as giving directions to visitors.

    “Regarding Olivaw's scenario, in short-term interaction sessions, without emotional reaction functions, it can still provide basic services such as giving directions to visitors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Human perception of a breach and its severity is flexible and context-dependent.

    “Human perception of a breach and its severity is flexible and context-dependent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Human perception of a breach and its severity is flexible and context-dependent.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The service breakdown in Lee et al.'s study is a performance error by the paper's definition, while a robot displaying inappropriate social behaviors after a service breakdown is a social error by the paper's definition.

    “The service breakdown (bringing a wrong drink) in their simulated study is a performance error by our definition, while a robot displaying inappropriate social behaviors (e.g., using an ineffective recovery strategy) after a service breakdown is a social error by our definition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The polar expedition context puts the human-robot team in an extreme environment.

    “Note that the polar expedition context puts the human-robot team in an extreme environment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because the goal of a robot carer is to provide longitudinal service, its socio-affective functions need to be personalized through accumulated interaction experiences.

    “Because the goal of Calvin is to provide longitudinal service to Frank, its socio-affective functions need to be personalized through accumulated interaction experiences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The paper's taxonomy of social errors in HRI focuses on how errors influence users' perception of the socio-affective competence of a robot and their perceived social relationship with it.

    “To address this, our taxonomy of social errors in HRI focuses on how errors in HRI influence users' perception of the socio-affective competence of a robot and their perceived social relationship with it.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This focus is especially important for HRI systems with socially oriented goals, i.e., social robots.

    “This is especially important for HRI systems with socially oriented goals, i.e., social robots.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Honig and Oron-Gilad [70] proposed to classify HRI errors as either technical failures or interaction failures.

    “In a recent effort, Honig and Oron-Gilad [70] proposed to classify HRI errors as either technical failures or interaction failures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [70] 70. Shanee Sarah Honig and Tal Oron-Gilad. 2018. Understanding and resolving failures in human-robot interaction: Literature review and model development. Front. Psychol. 9 (2018), 861. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    If Calvin cannot understand and adjust to Frank's reception of different stages of treatment plans, it will not be able to provide effective care over time (E3.5).

    “If Calvin cannot understand and adjust to Frank's reception of different stages of treatment plans, it will not be able to provide effective care over time (E3.5 incorrect assessment of a user's reception of HRI)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    If Calvin fails to establish and maintain a social relationship with Frank over time (E2.7), it is unlikely to achieve the expected health benefits of engaging Frank in social interactions.

    “if Calvin is unable to establish and maintain a social relationship with Frank over time (E2.7), it is unlikely to achieve the expected health benefits of engaging Frank in social interactions”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    In longitudinal HRI, social errors can damage a user's perceived social relationship with a robot and lead to its abandonment.

    “In longitudinal HRI, social errors can damage a user's perceived social relationship with a robot and lead to its abandonment”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    If a robot carer fails to initiate or respond to reciprocal social communication, it may lead to the user's rejection of the robot or compromise his desire to use it.

    “Thus, if Calvin fails to initiate or respond to reciprocal social communication (E2.5), it may lead to Frank's rejection of Calvin or compromise his desire to use it.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Failures to exhibit assertiveness (E2.3) can reduce other team members' evaluation of the capability of Reventlov and their willingness to comply with the plans it proposes.

    “Failures to exhibit assertiveness (E2.3) can reduce other team members' evaluation of the capability of Reventlov and their willingness to comply with the plans it proposes”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Performance errors degrade a user's impressions of a robot's competence, while social errors degrade a user's impressions of a robot's warmth and result in similar emotional and behavioral reactions to the robot as they do towards humans.

    “we expect performance errors to degrade a user's impressions of a robot's competence, while social errors will degrade a user's impressions of a robot's warmth and result in similar emotional and behavioral reactions to the robot as they do towards humans”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Insufficient communicative functions may degrade a user's perception of a conversational robot's competence in achieving tasks as well as degrading her perception of the robot's socio-affective competence.

    “insufficient communicative functions may degrade a user's perception of a conversational robot's competence in achieving tasks as well as degrading her perception of the robot's socio-affective competence”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Social relationship has known health benefits, and perceived social relationship with another entity represents the perceived adequacy of resources provided by the other entity.

    “Social relationship has known health benefits [72], and perceived social relationship with another entity represents the perceived adequacy of resources provided by the other entity [26].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [72] 72. James S. House, Cynthia Robbins, and Helen L. Metzner. 1982. The association of social relationships and activities with mortality: Prospective evidence from the Tecumseh Community Health Study. Amer. J. Epidem. 116, 1 (1982), 123-140. source
    • cites [26] 26. Sheldon Cohen. 2004. Social relationships and health. Amer. Psychol. 59, 8 (2004), 676. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Understanding social errors in HRI is key to design advanced error handling and failure recovery strategies, which leads to better interaction experiences and outcomes.

    “Understanding social errors in HRI is key to design advanced error handling and failure recovery strategies, which leads to better interaction experiences and outcomes”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
131 of 131
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The impact of HRI errors and effective strategies to handle such impact remains an open question.

    “The impact of these errors and effective strategies to handle such an impact remains an open question.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Current social-emotional interaction functions of HRI systems are far below human-level performance, and errors are inevitable during interactions.

    “Current social-emotional interaction functions of HRI systems are far below human-level performance, and errors are inevitable during interactions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Errors in HRI may have a significant impact on a user's perception of a robot.

    “These errors may have a significant impact on a user's perception of a robot.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Error handling in HRI is not yet fully understood, especially regarding errors on the social-emotional dimension.

    “However, error handling in HRI is not yet fully understood, especially regarding errors on the social-emotional dimension.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Error identification and recovery remain a challenging topic in current HRI research, especially on the social-emotional dimension.

    “Error identification and recovery remain a challenging topic in current HRI research, especially on the social-emotional dimension.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The 30 attributes of socio-affective competence identified from human studies are applicable to a broad class of HRI scenarios and application domains.

    “We expect these attributes to be applicable to a broad class of HRI scenarios and application domains.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The three hypothetical HRI scenarios are believable situations that approximate real-life situations.

    “We create three hypothetical HRI scenarios following the ecological validity guideline, i.e., these are believable situations that approximate real-life situations.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Human perception of a breach and its severity is flexible and context-dependent.

    “Human perception of a breach and its severity is flexible and context-dependent.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The judgment of whether a behavior is normative or not varies across cultural, contextual, and individual factors.

    “Note that for each attribute of the socio-affective competence we identified, the judgment of whether a behavior is normative or not varies across cultural, contextual, and individual factors.”
9 of 9

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Adaptation error is assigned the wrong taxonomy code

    Minor

    The example labels Churi's lack of adaptation as E4.5, but Table 4 assigns absence of adaptation to E4.6. E4.5 concerns maintaining user engagement.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Oriel Feldman Hall and Luke J . Chang . 2018 . Social learning: Emotions aid in optimizing goal-directed social behavior. In Goal-directed Decision Making. Elsevier , 309--330. Oriel Feldman Hall and Luke J. Chang. 2018. Social learning: Emotions aid in optimizing goal-directed social behavior. In Goal-directed Decision Making. Elsevier, 309--330.
  2. Julia Hirschberg . 2011 . Speaking more like you: Entrainment in conversational speech . In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. Julia Hirschberg. 2011. Speaking more like you: Entrainment in conversational speech. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the International Speech Communication Association.
  3. 10.5555/3378680.3378853 · DOI
  4. Rivka Levitan , Agustín Gravano , Laura Willson , Stefan Benus , Julia Hirschberg , and Ani Nenkova . 2012 . Acoustic-prosodic entrainment and social behavior . In Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computational Linguistics, 11--19 . Rivka Levitan, Agustín Gravano, Laura Willson, Stefan Benus, Julia Hirschberg, and Ani Nenkova. 2012. Acoustic-prosodic entrainment and social behavior. In Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computational Linguistics, 11--19.
  5. M. Lewis , J. M. Laviland-Jones , and L. Fildman Barret . 2012. Self-conscious emotions-embarrassment, pride, shame, and guilt. Handbook of Emotions . The Guilford Press . M. Lewis, J. M. Laviland-Jones, and L. Fildman Barret. 2012. Self-conscious emotions-embarrassment, pride, shame, and guilt. Handbook of Emotions. The Guilford Press.
  6. Maranda McBride and Shona Morgan . 2010 . Trust calibration for automated decision aids . Institute for Homeland Security Solutions. Retrieved January 21, 2021 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303168234_Trust_calibration_for_automated_decision_aids. Maranda McBride and Shona Morgan. 2010. Trust calibration for automated decision aids. Institute for Homeland Security Solutions. Retrieved January 21, 2021 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303168234_Trust_calibration_for_automated_decision_aids.
  7. Donald A. Norman and Stephen W . Draper . 1986 . User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-computer Interaction. CRC Press . Donald A. Norman and Stephen W. Draper. 1986. User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-computer Interaction. CRC Press.
  8. 10.5555/265013 · DOI
  9. Dag Sverre Syrdal , Michael L. Walters , Nuno Otero , Kheng Lee Koay , and Kerstin Dautenhahn . 2007 . He knows when you are sleeping—Privacy and the personal robot companion . In Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Implications of Human-robot Interaction, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’07) . 28--33. Dag Sverre Syrdal, Michael L. Walters, Nuno Otero, Kheng Lee Koay, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2007. He knows when you are sleeping—Privacy and the personal robot companion. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Implications of Human-robot Interaction, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’07). 28--33.
  10. Jane Wu , Erin Paeng , Kari Linder , Piercarlo Valdesolo , and James C. Boerkoel . 2016. Trust and cooperation in human-robot decision making . In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium Series. Jane Wu, Erin Paeng, Kari Linder, Piercarlo Valdesolo, and James C. Boerkoel. 2016. Trust and cooperation in human-robot decision making. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium Series.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tian, L., & Oviatt, S.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
Published
2021-02-09
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
1-32
ISSN
2573-9522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128510346
Cited by
133
References
157
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
18.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
human-robot interaction, socioemotional skills, trust in robots, user perception of robots, user heterogeneity, in-the-wild deployment, social interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review