Cited by 5Digital Mental Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMobile Health and mHealth Applications

User Experiences of a Mobile Mental Well-Being Intervention Among Pregnant Women

Muuraiskangas, Salla, Mattila, Elina, Kyttälä, Pipsa, Koreasalo, Mirva, Lappalainen, Raimo·2016·Communications in Computer and Information Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-32270-4_14

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muuraiskangas, S., Mattila, E., Kyttälä, P., Koreasalo, M., & Lappalainen, R.
Affiliations
  • VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
  • Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
  • University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Corresponding author
Muuraiskangas, Salla
Venue
Communications in Computer and Information Science
Published
2016
Pages
140-149
ISSN
  • 1865-0929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-0937
OpenAlex
W2461445903
Cited by
5
References
18
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.78
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communications in computer and information science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
postpartum depression, pregnant women, acceptance and commitment therapy, digital mental health interventions, user experience, app usage behavior, barriers to use, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review