Cited by 119Brain Tumor Detection and ClassificationMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Local Structure Prediction with Convolutional Neural Networks for Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation

Dvořák, Pavel, Menze, Bjoern·2016·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-42016-5_6

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dvořák, P., & Menze, B.
Affiliations
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments (CZ)
Corresponding author
  • Dvořák, Pavel
  • Menze, Bjoern
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2016
Pages
59-71
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2477630714
Cited by
119
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5
FWCI
12.55
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • ASEP (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
brain tumor segmentation, multimodal medical image segmentation, convolutional neural networks, 3D segmentation, intensity correlations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review