The DOI matches its Crossref record.
DOI Links on Wikipedia: Analyses of English, Japanese, and Chinese Wikipedias
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several studies have been conducted regarding scholarly bibliographic references on Wikipedia; however, most of them have focused on the scholarly document itself2–6.”
From Dataset of first appearances of the scholarly bibliographic references on Wikipedia articles (2022) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Hence, little is known of the editors and their contributions to the addition of scholarly references to Wikipedia.”
From Dataset of first appearances of the scholarly bibliographic references on Wikipedia articles (2022) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“The methodologies in previous studies used to identify the scholarly references on Wikipedia can be classified as follows: (1) extracting them from either page texts (Wikitexts) or Wikipedia external links2–4, (2) detecting the pages contain them by using web search engines5, and (3) analyzing usage log data6.”
From Dataset of first appearances of the scholarly bibliographic references on Wikipedia articles (2022) · cites this paper as [4]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- The International 2016, DOI Foundation. Digital Object Identifier System. http://www.doi.org/ . Accessed April 12, 2016
- The International 2016, DOI Foundation. Key Facts on Digital Object Identifier System. https://www.doi.org/factsheets/DOIKeyFacts.html . Accessed June 19, 2016
- The International: DOI Foundation. (2016). doi:Registration Agencies. http://www.doi.org/registration_agencies.html . Accessed April 12, 2016
- Nielsen, F.A.: Scientific citations in wikipedia. First Monday 12(8), 795–825 (2007). http://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v12i8.1997 · DOI · Paper page
- Lin, J., Fenner, M.: An analysis of Wikipedia references across PLOS publications. In: altmetrics14 Workshop at WebSci, June 2014. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1048991.v3 · DOI · Paper page
- The International: DOI Foundation. (2016). doi:Registration Agencies. http://www.doi.org/registration_agencies.html . Accessed April 12, 2016
- Tzekou, P., Stamou, S., Kirtsis, N., Zotos, N.: Quality assessment of Wikipedia external links. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, pp. 248–254 (2011). http://www.dblab.upatras.gr/download/nlp/NLP-Group-Pubs/11-WEBIST_Wikipedia_External_Links.pdf
- Sato, S., Yoshida, M., Ambiru, T., Itsumura, T.: Characteristics of external links and dead links in Japanese Wikipedia. J. Jpn Soc. Inf. Knowl. 21(2), 157–162 (2011). http://doi.org/10.2964/jsik.21_06 , in Japanese · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dataset of first appearances of the scholarly bibliographic references on Wikipedia articles
Kikkawa, J., Takaku, M., & Yoshikane, F. (2022) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01190-z · Cited by 4
Self-citationKikkawa, J., Takaku, M., & Yoshikane, F. (2023) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-28032-0_33
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kikkawa, J., Takaku, M., & Yoshikane, F.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 369-380
- ISSN
- 0302-9743
- 1611-3349
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
