Emerging Research, Practice, and Policy on Computational Thinking
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In many cases, teachers let students work on the project without any particular constraints.
“In many cases, teachers let the students work in the project without any particular constraints (Buss & Gamboa, 2017;Sadik et al., 2017).”
From Fostering computational thinking through educational robotics: a model for creative computational problem solving (2020) · cites this paper as Buss & Gamboa, 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 2 · Cited by 120
- Authors
- Hodges, C. B., & Rich, P. J.
- Affiliations
- Brigham Young University (US)
- Georgia Southern University (US)
- ORCID
- Charles B. Hodges
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2017
- OpenAlex
- W2607647748
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 12.36
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- computational thinking, programming education, computer science education, curriculum policy, 21st century skills, elementary school, adult learning, lifelong learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
