The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Publics, Elites and Constitutional Change in the UK
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Scotland, shortly after younger people were allowed to vote for the first time, support for allowing votes at 16 at all elections in the UK rose to 50% in Scotland and later increased further to around 60%.
“Shortly after the younger people had been allowed to vote for the first time, support for allowing votes at 16 at all elections in the UK rose to 50% in Scotland (Kenealy et al., 2017, pp. 45-76) and even increased further to around 60% (Electoral Commission, 2014).”
From Lowering the Voting Age to 16 in Practice: Processes and Outcomes Compared (2021) · cites this paper as Kenealy et al., 2017
In relation to voting at 16, positive effects are more likely to materialise when civic education is extensive, as seen in Scotland and Austria.
“In relation to voting at 16, positive effects discussed above are more likely to materialise when civic education is extensive, as could be seen in Scotland (Kenealy et al., 2017) and Austria (Schwarzer and Zeglovits, 2013;Zeglovits and Zandonella, 2013).”
From Lowering the Voting Age to 16 in Practice: Processes and Outcomes Compared (2021) · cites this paper as Kenealy et al., 2017
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lowering the Voting Age to 16 in Practice: Processes and Outcomes Compared
Eichhorn, J., & Bergh, J. (2021) · Parliamentary Affairs · doi:10.1093/pa/gsab019 · Cited by 25
Self-citationGover, D., & Kenny, M. (2018) · Parliamentary Affairs · doi:10.1093/pa/gsy003 · Cited by 16
“Indeed, as noted by Kenealy et al. (2017), the West Lothian anomaly has often been conflated with the much wider English Question.”
BackgroundVotes at 16 in Scotland: Political Experiences Beyond the Vote Itself
Huebner, C., & Eichhorn, J. (2020) · Lowering the Voting Age to 16 · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32541-1_7 · Cited by 12
Self-citationAnderson, P., & Swan, C. B. (2024) · Parliamentary Affairs · doi:10.1093/pa/gsae020 · Cited by 4
“…established to enhance Scottish devolution in the aftermath of the vote against independence took place on a timeline of the UK Government’s choosing and did not, by virtue of both time and structure, mean-ingfully engage with a more expansive understanding of reform (Kenealy et al., 2017: 77–102).”
Missing an Opportunity? The Limited Civic Imagination of Votes at 16
Bowman, B. (2021) · Parliamentary Affairs · doi:10.1093/pa/gsab016 · Cited by 4
Huebner, C., & Eichhorn, J. (2022) · Scottish Affairs · doi:10.3366/scot.2022.0407 · Cited by 4
Self-citationBorrowing to invest: Why the people in Germany and the UK do not prioritise fiscal responsibility
Eichhorn, J. (2026) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/beag009 · Cited by 1
Self-citationKenealy, D., & Parry, R. (2017) · British Politics · doi:10.1057/s41293-017-0063-7 · Cited by 1
Self-citationThe Politics of Scotland’s Public Finances
Heald, D. A. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198825098.013.27 · Cited by 1
The Civil Service and Government Structures
Parry, R. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198825098.013.20 · Cited by 1
Self-citationBergh, J., & Eichhorn, J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32541-1_1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kenealy, D., Eichhorn, J., Parry, R., Paterson, L., & Remond, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2017
- OpenAlex
- W2731145961
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Systems and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
- Keywords
- constitutional change, public opinion, elites, governance, Scottish independence referendum 2014, British politics, constitutional politics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
