Cited by 2Migration, Refugees, and IntegrationDiaspora, migration, transnational identityMigration, Racism, and Human Rights

Citizenship and Migration in South Korea. In the Forefront of Democracies?

Pedroza, Luicy, Mosler, Hannes B.·2018·Korea’s Quest for Economic Democratization

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-57066-2_9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Korea is the only country in Asia to have introduced enfranchisement of foreigners.

    “Thus, Korea is the only country in Asia to have introduced enfranchisement of foreigners (cf.Mosler & Pedroza, 2016;Pedroza & Mosler, 2017).”

    From The Oldest Societies in Asia: The Politics of Ageing in South Korea and Japan (2021) · cites this paper as Pedroza & Mosler, 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pedroza, L., & Mosler, H. B.
Affiliations
  • German Institute for Global and Area Studies (DE)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Pedroza, Luicy
Venue
Korea’s Quest for Economic Democratization
Published
2017-09-07
Pages
209-232
OpenAlex
W2753156308
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
  • Social Sciences › Health › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
Keywords
citizenship, migration policy, democratization, South Korea, foreign residents, political integration, human rights, reciprocity, civil society, immigrant associations, ethnic nationalism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review