Cited by 20Education and Technology IntegrationEducational Technology in LearningEducation and Digital Technologies

Information and Communication Technologies’ Pedagogical Affordances in Education

Dlamini, Reuben, Nkambule, Fikile·2020·Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_216-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Cited by

Authors
Dlamini, R., & Nkambule, F.
Affiliations
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Corresponding author
Dlamini, Reuben
Venue
Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies
Published
2019-12-13
Pages
1-14
OpenAlex
W4238985191
Cited by
20
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education and Digital Technologies
Keywords
information and communication technologies, pedagogical affordances, ICT integration in education, digital learning environments, teaching-learning process, educational technology adoption, alternative teaching methods, knowledge economy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review