The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time-Memory Tradeoff Attacks on the MTP Proof-of-Work Scheme
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Note that such a computation cannot be parallelized and, thus, achieves the verifiable time-space trade-off during the computation [16].”
From IoT Expunge: Implementing Verifiable Retention of IoT Data (2020) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
A Digital Signature Based on a Conventional Encryption Function
Merkle, R. C. (1988) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48184-2_32 · Cited by 1,998
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Alwen, J., Blocki, J.: Efficiently computing data-independent memory-hard functions. In: Robshaw, M., Katz, J. (eds.) CRYPTO 2016. LNCS, vol. 9815, pp. 241–271. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53008-5_9 · DOI
- Alwen, J., Blocki, J.: Towards practical attacks on Argon2i and balloon hashing. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2016:759 (2016). Presented at the IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (2017) · DOI
- Ateniese, G., Bonacina, I., Faonio, A., Galesi, N.: Proofs of space: when space is of the essence. In: Abdalla, M., Prisco, R. (eds.) SCN 2014. LNCS, vol. 8642, pp. 538–557. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10879-7_31 · DOI
- Aumasson, J.-P., Neves, S., Wilcox-O’Hearn, Z., Winnerlein, C.: BLAKE2: simpler, smaller, fast as MD5. In: Jacobson, M., Locasto, M., Mohassel, P., Safavi-Naini, R. (eds.) ACNS 2013. LNCS, vol. 7954, pp. 119–135. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38980-1_8 · DOI · Paper page
- Biryukov, A., Dinu, D., Khovratovich, D.: Argon2: new generation of memory-hard functions for password hashing and other applications. In: IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy, EuroS&P 2016, Saarbrücken, Germany, 21–24 March 2016, pp. 292–302. IEEE (2016) · DOI
- Biryukov, A., Khovratovich, D.: Egalitarian computing. In: Holz, T., Savage, S. (eds.) 25th USENIX Security Symposium, USENIX Security 2016, Austin, TX, USA, 10–12 August 2016, pp. 315–326. USENIX Association (2016)
- Bonneau, A.N.J., Felten, E., Miller, A., Goldfeder, S.: Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies: A Comprehensive Introduction. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2016)
- Dwork, C., Naor, M.: Pricing via processing or combatting junk mail. In: Brickell, E.F. (ed.) CRYPTO 1992. LNCS, vol. 740, pp. 139–147. Springer, Heidelberg (1993). doi:10.1007/3-540-48071-4_10 · DOI · Paper page
- Dziembowski, S., Faust, S., Kolmogorov, V., Pietrzak, K.: Proofs of space. In: Gennaro, R., Robshaw, M. (eds.) CRYPTO 2015. LNCS, vol. 9216, pp. 585–605. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48000-7_29 · DOI · Paper page
- Mahmoody, M., Moran, T., Vadhan, S.P.: Publicly verifiable proofs of sequential work. In: Kleinberg, R.D. (ed.) Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, ITCS 2013, Berkeley, CA, USA, 9–12 January 2013, pp. 373–388. ACM (2013) · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
IoT Expunge: Implementing Verifiable Retention of IoT Data
Panwar, N., Sharma, S., Gupta, P., Ghosh, D., Mehrotra, S., & Venkatasubramanian, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy · doi:10.1145/3374664.3375737 · Cited by 6
“Note that such a computation cannot be parallelized and, thus, achieves the verifiable time-space trade-off during the computation [16].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Dinur, I., & Nadler, N.
- Affiliations
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Dinur, Itai
- ORCID
- Dinur, Itai
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 2017
- Pages
- 375-403
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2732356589
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.37
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Keywords
- proof-of-work, MTP, memory-hard functions, time-memory trade-off, memory access patterns
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review