Pricing via processing or combatting junk mail
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The paper proposes to use memory-hard functions to delete encrypted sensor data at the cloud during the state transition phase.
“We propose to use memory-hard functions [6, 13, 18, 19] to delete encrypted sensor data at the cloud, during state transition phase.”
From IoT Expunge: Implementing Verifiable Retention of IoT Data (2020) · cites this paper as [18]
The paper provides a verifiable data deletion or expunge protocol based on memory-hard functions that does not exploit any trusted party to execute verification.
“A verifiable data deletion/expunge protocol based on memoryhard functions [6, 18, 19] (§5.2 and §5.3), which do not exploit any trusted-party to execute verification.”
From IoT Expunge: Implementing Verifiable Retention of IoT Data (2020) · cites this paper as [18]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bitcoin and beyond: a technical survey on decentralized digital currencies
Tschorsch, F., & Scheuermann, B. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2535718 · Cited by 1,690 · see citing works
The Quest for Scalable Blockchain Fabric: Proof-of-Work vs. BFT Replication
Vukolić, M. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39028-4_9 · Cited by 1,051 · see citing works
A survey on essential components of a self-sovereign identity
Mühle, A., Grüner, A., Gayvoronskaya, T., & Meinel, C. (2018) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2018.10.002 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
A survey of learning-based techniques of email spam filtering
Blanzieri, E., & Bryl, A. (2008) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-009-9109-6 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Dziembowski, S., Faust, S., Kolmogorov, V., & Pietrzak, K. (2015) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48000-7_29 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
A Review of Blockchain Architecture and Consensus Protocols: Use Cases, Challenges, and Solutions
Ismail, L., & Materwala, H. (2019) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym11101198 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Sanka, A. I., Irfan, M., Huang, I., & Cheung, R. C. C. (2021) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2020.12.028 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
MIStore: a Blockchain-Based Medical Insurance Storage System
Zhou, L., Wang, L., & Sun, Y. (2018) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-018-0996-4 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Proof of Authentication: IoT-Friendly Blockchains
Puthal, D., & Mohanty, S. P. (2019) · IEEE Potentials · doi:10.1109/mpot.2018.2850541 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
SoK: Everyone Hates Robocalls: A Survey of Techniques Against Telephone Spam
Tu, H., Doupe, A., Zhao, Z., & Ahn, G.-J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2016.27 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
The Unreasonable Fundamental Incertitudes Behind Bitcoin Mining
Courtois, N. T., Grajek, M., & Naik, R. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.7935 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Lockley, A., Mi, Z., & Coffman, D. (2019) · Frontiers of Engineering Management · doi:10.1007/s42524-019-0010-y · Cited by 26 · see citing works
IoT Expunge: Implementing Verifiable Retention of IoT Data
Panwar, N., Sharma, S., Gupta, P., Ghosh, D., Mehrotra, S., & Venkatasubramanian, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy · doi:10.1145/3374664.3375737 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dwork, C., & Naor, M.
- Affiliations
- IBM Research - Almaden (US)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2007-08-05
- Pages
- 139-147
- OpenAlex
- W1601379374
- Cited by
- 1,282
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 132 · 2019: 137 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 24.91
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Keywords
- junk mail, access control, shared resource access, pricing function, cryptographic signatures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
