Narrative Experiences of History and Complex Systems
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scholars working on complexity have pointed out the need for 'new narratives'.
“Indeed, scholars working on complexity have pointed out the need for”
From Interactive digital narrative (IDN)—new ways to represent complexity and facilitate digitally empowered citizens (2022) · cites this paper as Turina, 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Koenitz, H., Barbara, J., & Eladhari, M. P. (2022) · New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia · doi:10.1080/13614568.2023.2181503 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“For the topic of history, Turina (2018) suggests that CAS representations present a “ continuously changing interaction ” which, due to its causal-ity-feedback loop, needs “ new narrative tools ” (p. 124) that “ narrat(e) the past from di ff erent points of view ” (p. 126).”
Background
- Authors
- Turina, R.
- Affiliations
- University of York (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Turina, Romana
- ORCID
- Turina, Romana
- Venue
- Narrating Complexity
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 123-141
- OpenAlex
- W2899434547
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (WT098455, WT108720)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Philosophy, History, and Historiography
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Digital Humanities and Scholarship
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
- Keywords
- historical narratives, virtual reality, historical mediation, archival evidence, complex systems simulation, meaning-making, historical knowledge, interactive user interface
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
