Cited by 25Epistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsWittgensteinian philosophy and applicationsFeminist Epistemology and Gender Studies

Epistemic Pluralism, Epistemic Relativism and ‘Hinge’ Epistemology

Adam Carter, J.·2017·Epistemic Pluralism

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-65460-7_9

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These Indigenous frameworks offer means to conceptualize and operationalize the cross-fertilization and coming together of distinct knowledge systems-epistemic pluralism through an Indigenous lens.

    “They offer means to conceptualize and operationalize the cross-fertilization and coming together of distinct knowledge systems-epistemic pluralism (Carter, 2017) through an Indigenous lens.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adam Carter, J.
Venue
Epistemic Pluralism
Published
2017
Pages
229-249
OpenAlex
W2739306772
Cited by
24
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
19.87
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
Keywords
epistemological pluralism, epistemic relativism, hinge epistemology, Wittgenstein, epistemic diversity, Paul Boghossian, Duncan Pritchard, John MacFarlane, epistemic systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review