Cited by 11Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics ResearchAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies

Design and First Test of the New Synchronous 200 Hz System for Unsteady Pressure Field Measurement

Filipský, Jakub, Čížek, Jan, Wittmeier, Felix, Kuthada, Timo, Meier, Simon·2018·Progress in Vehicle Aerodynamics and Thermal Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-67822-1_17

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Filipský, J., Čížek, J., Wittmeier, F., Kuthada, T., & Meier, S.
Affiliations
Research Institute of Automotive Engineering and Vehicle Engines Stuttgart (DE)
Corresponding author
Filipský, Jakub
Venue
Progress in Vehicle Aerodynamics and Thermal Management
Published
2017-12-05
Pages
252-263
OpenAlex
W2772536211
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.96
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies
Keywords
unsteady pressure measurement, MEMS pressure sensor, vehicle aerodynamics, unsteady flow, pressure field measurement, wind tunnel model testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review