Cited by 5Digital and Cyber ForensicsScientific Computing and Data ManagementBlockchain Technology Applications and Security

The Full Provenance Stack: Five Layers for Complete and Meaningful Provenance

Ko, Ryan K. L., Phua, Thye Way·2017·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-72395-2_18

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • W3C PROV is capable of capturing aspects relevant for compliance and accountability, for example recording which parties undertook various activities with regard to data, or modelling GDPR compliance.

    “W3C PROV is capable of capturing aspects relevant for compliance and accountability, for example, for recording which parties undertook various activities with regard to data, or modelling GDPR compliance [49].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ko, R. K. L., & Phua, T. W.
Affiliations
University of Waikato (NZ)
Corresponding author
Ko, Ryan K. L.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2017
Pages
180-193
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2771930793
Cited by
5
References
18
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.63
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital and Cyber Forensics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Keywords
data provenance, cybersecurity, digital forensics, data privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review