CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 44Gender, Feminism, and MediaHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mediated Misogynoir: Intersecting Race and Gender in Online Harassment

Madden, Stephanie, Janoske, Melissa, Briones Winkler, Rowena, Edgar, Amanda Nell·2018·Mediating Misogyny
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-72917-6_4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-72917-6_4

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 22 references

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 44

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Madden, S., Janoske, M., Briones Winkler, R., & Edgar, A. N.
Affiliations
University of Memphis (US)
ORCID
Venue
Mediating Misogyny
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2018
Pages
71-90
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-72917-6_4
OpenAlex
W2790475792
Cited by
44
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 2
FWCI
20.74
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
online harassment, Black women, online communities, intersectionality, race and gender, personal narrative, online abuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review