The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Misogynoir: public online response towards self-reported misogynoir
Abstract
"Misogynoir" refers to the specific forms of misogyny that Black women experience, which couple racism and sexism together. To better understand the online manifestations of this type of hate, and to propose methods that can automatically identify it, in this paper, we conduct a study on 4 cases of Black women in Tech reporting experiences of misogynoir on the Twitter platform. We follow the reactions to these cases (both supportive and non-supportive responses), and categorise them within a model of misogynoir that highlights experiences of Tone Policing, White Centring, Racial Gaslighting and Defensiveness. As an intersectional form of abusive or hateful speech, we investigate the possibilities and challenges to detect online instances of misogynoir in an automated way. We then conduct a closer qualitative analysis on messages of support and non-support to look at some of these categories in more detail. The purpose of this investigation is to understand responses to misogynoir online, including doubling down on misogynoir, engaging in performative allyship, and showing solidarity with Black women in tech.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“They lack sensitivity to context, which is an essential component for misogynoir detection.”
From Misogynoir: challenges in detecting intersectional hate (2022) · cites this paper as Kwarteng et al. 2021
In the citing paper
“As stated in(Kwarteng etal. 2021), misogynoir is very contextual, and in order to appropriately annotate the dataset, we needed to contextualise and understand the purpose of each tweet.”
From Misogynoir: challenges in detecting intersectional hate (2022) · cites this paper as Kwarteng et al. 2021
In the citing paper
“From our previous work(Kwarteng etal. 2021), we learnt that both our case studies' supporters and non-supporters often used the same words and phrases in their tweets.”
From Misogynoir: challenges in detecting intersectional hate (2022) · cites this paper as Kwarteng et al. 2021
In the citing paper
“It is worth noting that the 2519 tweets had already been annotated by two annotators (authors of the paper), with a computed Cohen's Kappa inter-annotator agreement 5 value of 0.79 (high agreement)(Kwarteng etal. 2021).”
From Misogynoir: challenges in detecting intersectional hate (2022) · cites this paper as Kwarteng et al. 2021
Citations
Cites
On misogynoir: citation, erasure, and plagiarism
Bailey, M. (2018) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2018.1447395 · Cited by 659
Mediated Misogynoir: Intersecting Race and Gender in Online Harassment
Madden, S., Janoske, M., Briones Winkler, R., & Edgar, A. N. (2018) · Mediating Misogyny · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-72917-6_4 · Cited by 44
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Epstein , R. , Blake , J. , and González , T ., " Girlhood interrupted: The erasure of black girls' childhood ," Available at SSRN 3000695 , 2017 . Epstein, R., Blake, J., and González, T., "Girlhood interrupted: The erasure of black girls' childhood," Available at SSRN 3000695, 2017.
- Tan , Y. C. and Celis , L. E ., " Assessing social and intersectional biases in contextualized word representations ," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2019 , pp. 13 230 -- 213 241. Tan, Y. C. and Celis, L. E., "Assessing social and intersectional biases in contextualized word representations," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019, pp. 13 230--13 241.
- 10.1080/07370008.2017.1355211 · DOI
- 10.1177/0002764219842619 · DOI
- Oluo , I. , So you want to talk about race . Hachette UK , 2019 . Oluo, I., So you want to talk about race. Hachette UK, 2019.
- Noble , S. and Roberts , S. , Technological elites, the meritocracy, and postracial myths in silicon valley . Duke University Press , 2019 . Noble, S. and Roberts, S., Technological elites, the meritocracy, and postracial myths in silicon valley. Duke University Press, 2019.
- 10.1017/S1358246118000565 · DOI
- 10.1080/1041794X.2018.1505940 · DOI
- Eddo-Lodge , R. , Why I'm no longer talking to white people about race . Bloomsbury Publishing , 2020 . Eddo-Lodge, R., Why I'm no longer talking to white people about race. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2020.
- 10.1215/9781478007098 · DOI · Paper page
- Crenshaw , K. W. , On intersectionality: Essential writings . The New Press , 2017 . Crenshaw, K. W., On intersectionality: Essential writings. The New Press, 2017.
- 10.1177/0309132519863479 · DOI
- Schmidt , A. and Wiegand , M. , " A survey on hate speech detection using natural language processing," in Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on natural language processing for social media , 2017 , pp. 1 -- 10 . Schmidt, A. and Wiegand, M., "A survey on hate speech detection using natural language processing," in Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on natural language processing for social media, 2017, pp. 1--10.
- Saleem , H. M. , Dillon , K. P. , Benesch , S. , and Ruths , D. , " A web of hate: Tackling hateful speech in online social spaces," arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.10159 , 2017 . Saleem, H. M., Dillon, K. P., Benesch, S., and Ruths, D., "A web of hate: Tackling hateful speech in online social spaces," arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.10159, 2017. · arXiv
- 10.1140/epjds/s13688-020-00236-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Magu , R. , Joshi , K. , and Luo , J. , " Detecting the hate code on social media," in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media , vol. 11 , no. 1, 2017. Magu, R., Joshi, K., and Luo, J., "Detecting the hate code on social media," in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 11, no. 1, 2017.
- Farrell , T. , Fernandez , M. , Novotny , J. , and Alani , H. , " Exploring misogyny across the manosphere in reddit," in Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science , 2019 , pp. 87 -- 96 . Farrell, T., Fernandez, M., Novotny, J., and Alani, H., "Exploring misogyny across the manosphere in reddit," in Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science, 2019, pp. 87--96.
- Gorrell G. Bakir M. E. Greenwood M. A. Roberts I. and Bontcheva K. "Race and religion in online abuse towards uk politicians " arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.00920 2019. Gorrell G. Bakir M. E. Greenwood M. A. Roberts I. and Bontcheva K. "Race and religion in online abuse towards uk politicians " arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.00920 2019. · DOI
- Kshirsagar R. Cukuvac T. McKeown K. and McGregor S. "Predictive embeddings for hate speech detection on twitter " arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.10644 2018. Kshirsagar R. Cukuvac T. McKeown K. and McGregor S. "Predictive embeddings for hate speech detection on twitter " arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.10644 2018. · DOI · Paper page
- Fereday , J. and Muir-Cochrane , E. , " Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis : A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development," International journal of qualitative methods , vol. 5 , no. 1, pp. 80--92, 2006. Fereday, J. and Muir-Cochrane, E., "Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development," International journal of qualitative methods, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 80--92, 2006.
- 10.18574/nyu/9780814784105.003.0006 · DOI
- Buolamwini , J. and Gebru , T. , " Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification," in Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency , 2018 , pp. 77 -- 91 . Buolamwini, J. and Gebru, T., "Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification," in Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, 2018, pp. 77--91.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Misogynoir: challenges in detecting intersectional hate
Kwarteng, J., Perfumi, S. C., Farrell, T., Third, A., & Fernandez, M. (2022) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-022-00993-7 · Cited by 30
“This study expands on our previous work (Kwarteng et al. 2021) that analysed the public response in Twitter towards the self-reported experiences of misogynoir of four Black women (case studies) in tech.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwarteng, J., Perfumi, S. C., Farrell, T., & Fernandez, M.
- Affiliations
- The Open University (GB)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Stockholm University, Sweden
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2021-11-08
- Pages
- 228-235
- OpenAlex
- W4213385622
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- misogynoir, online harassment, Twitter, defensiveness, performative allyship, intersectionality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review