CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6Reproductive Health and TechnologiesInternational Human Rights and Reproductive LawGlobal Healthcare and Medical Tourism

Cross-Border Reproflows: Comparing the Cases of India, Germany, and Israel

Open access
Mitra, Sayani·2018·Cross-Cultural Comparisons on Surrogacy and Egg Donation
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-78670-4_5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-78670-4_5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As a result of intense debates at both national and global levels of governance concerned with the supposedly unethical character of surrogacy, major commercial surrogacy destinations like India, Thailand, Nepal, Cambodia and Mexico have banned commercial surrogacy over the course of the last years, forcing surrogacy businesses either to close down or go underground.

    “As a result of intense debates at both national and global levels of governance concerned with the supposedly unethical character of surrogacy, major commercial surrogacy destinations like India, Thailand, Nepal, Cambodia and Mexico have banned commercial surrogacy over the course of the last years, forcing surrogacy businesses either to close down or go underground.”

    From The in/visible wombs of the market: the dialectics of waged and unwaged reproductive labour in the global surrogacy industry (2022) · cites this paper as Mitra, 2018

  • Although new commercial surrogacy markets are still opening up at the fertility 'frontier', e.g. in Georgia, Ukraine and Greece, there has been a notable trend in current policy discussions and academic debates to criminalise practices of commercial surrogacy.

    “Although new commercial surrogacy markets are still opening up at the fertility 'frontier', e.g. in Georgia, Ukraine and Greece, there has been a notable trend in current policy discussions and academic debates to criminalise practices of commercial surrogacy (Lewis, 2017; Mitra, 2018).”

    From The in/visible wombs of the market: the dialectics of waged and unwaged reproductive labour in the global surrogacy industry (2022) · cites this paper as Mitra, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitra, S.
Affiliations
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Mitra, Sayani
Venue
Cross-Cultural Comparisons on Surrogacy and Egg Donation
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2018
Pages
83-102
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-78670-4_5
OpenAlex
W2853751934
Cited by
6
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.47
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism
Keywords
oocyte donation, commercial surrogacy, reproductive technology, reproductive law, consumerism, capital accumulation, labor relations, India, Germany, Israel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review