The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Robot Rules: Regulating Artificial Intelligence
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A wave of new AI tools, designed for functions such as document processing or responding to shareholders' or stakeholders' queries, will enhance the efficiency of boards' decision-making processes.145”
From Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Decisions (2023) · cites this paper as [145]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Salles, A., Evers, K., & Farisco, M. (2020) · AJOB Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/21507740.2020.1740350 · Cited by 335
“…Neuroethics Program, Centro de Investigaciones Filosoficas (CIF), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. and the development of practical guidelines and recommendations (Boddington 2017; Tasioulas 2019; Turner 2019).”
BackgroundZajko, M. (2022) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12962 · Cited by 268
Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Decisions
Zhao, J., & Gómez Fariñas, B. (2023) · European Business Organization Law Review · doi:10.1007/s40804-022-00262-2 · Cited by 197
“113 Turner (2019), p 337. against women, 114 black people 115 and minority communities.”
BackgroundAI Governance in a Complex and Rapidly Changing Regulatory Landscape: A Global Perspective
Zaidan, E., & Ibrahim, I. A. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03560-x · Cited by 275
“This can take the form of a regulatory agency for AI (Erdélyi and Goldsmith, 2022), an International Arti fi cial Intelligence Organization; an International Academy for AI Law and Regulation (Turner, 2019); or an international coordinating mechanism under the Group of 20 (Jelinek et al., 2021).”
BackgroundAccess to Finance for Artificial Intelligence Regulation in the Financial Services Industry
Lee, J. (2020) · European Business Organization Law Review · doi:10.1007/s40804-020-00200-0 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Turner, J.
- Corresponding author
- Turner, Jacob
- ORCID
- Turner, Jacob
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2019
- OpenAlex
- W4251512016
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 13.73
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Law › Literary and Philosophical Studies
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, AI regulation, AI ethics, autonomous decision-making, AI governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review