Cited by 15Distributed systems and fault toleranceSafety Systems Engineering in AutonomySecurity and Verification in Computing

Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security: SAFECOMP 2018 Workshops, ASSURE, DECSoS, SASSUR, STRIVE, and WAISE, Västerås, Sweden, September 18, 2018, Proceedings

·2018·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-99229-7

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing standards were not aligned or designed with the challenges associated with M2M cybersecurity.

    “In [24,42,55] the authors state that the existing standards were not aligned/designed with the challenges associated with M2M cybersecurity.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2018
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2905666029
Cited by
15
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.24
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Security and Verification in Computing
Keywords
computer safety, software reliability, cybersecurity, ASSURE model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review