Constructions of Mutually Unbiased Bases
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Any coherent superposition of the two input states given in Eq.(3) is preserved by the QP transformation, leading to the equivalent superposition of the corresponding output states.
“It has been experimentally demonstrated that any coherent superposition of the two input states given in Eq.( 3) is preserved by the QP transformation, leading to the equivalent superposition of the corresponding output states [44].”
From Experimental generation and characterization of single-photon hybrid ququarts based on polarization and orbital angular momentum encoding (2010) · cites this paper as [44]
The quantum transferrer o2 → π achieves the transformation |Hπ|φo2 ⇒ |φπ|0o.
“Then the orbital contribution has been analysed adopting the quantum transferrer o 2 → π, which achieves the transformation |H π |ϕ o2 ⇒ |ϕ π |0 o [44,45].”
From Experimental generation and characterization of single-photon hybrid ququarts based on polarization and orbital angular momentum encoding (2010) · cites this paper as [44]
The transferrer presented in [44,45] is based on two waveplates, a q-plate and a polarizing beam-splitter, allowing coherent transfer of information initially encoded in polarization to the OAM degree of freedom.
“This transferrer, presented in [44,45], is based on two waveplates, a q-plate and a polarizing beam-splitter, thus allowing the coherent transfer of the information initially encoded in the polarization to the OAM degree of freedom.”
From Experimental generation and characterization of single-photon hybrid ququarts based on polarization and orbital angular momentum encoding (2010) · cites this paper as [44]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 288
- Authors
- Klappenecker, A., & Rötteler, M.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2004
- Pages
- 137-144
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2099101264
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Mitacs
- Agricultural Research Development Agency
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
- Keywords
- mutually unbiased bases, orthonormal bases, exponential sums, finite fields, prime power dimensions, quantum information
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
