Cited by 60Text and Document Classification TechnologiesAlgorithms and Data CompressionAdvanced Text Analysis Techniques

On Compression-Based Text Classification

Marton, Yuval, Wu, Ning, Hellerstein, Lisa·2005·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-31865-1_22

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Factors influencing the performance of existing authorship attribution models include the size of the training text, the number of candidate authors, and the imbalanced distribution of training texts among candidate authors.

    “Factors influencing the performance of existing authorship attribution models include the size of the training text [Hirst and Feiguina, 2007;Marton et al., 2005], the number of candidate authors [Koppel et al., 2006], and the imbalanced distribution of training texts among candidate authors [Stamatatos, 2008].”

    From Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Marton et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marton, Y., Wu, N., & Hellerstein, L.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2005
Pages
300-314
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W1953638699
Cited by
59
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.95
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
Keywords
text classification, text compression, punctuation, word stems, English text, feature extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review